Advanced Search Results

Rajesh Sharma and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and Etc.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 504 and 506; Arms Act - Sections 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 157, 159, 161, 174, 313 and 354(3)

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2646

the names of all the witnesses in the FIR, the object of which is only to set the crimianl law in motion. Kiran P.W. 7 herself was injured and being the niece of Hari Ram (deceased), had

Niranjan Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

why one post of Inspector was kept vacant when his case was considered during his involvement in a crimianl case as mentioned above. Mr. Saha has referred to Annexure R/3 appended to the affidavit-in-opposition which shows that

Parsotam Das and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1935All769; 158Ind.Cas.39

affected the mode of trial and was not merely an irregularity which could be cured by Section 537, Crimianl P.C., but was an illegality which could not be cured at all. This argument was advanced in the

Public Prosecutor Vs. Moturu Appalanarasayya

Court : Chennai

Subject : Crimianl

Reported in : AIR1940Mad268

Lakshmana Rao, J.1. The view of the Stationary-Magistrate that there was no proper com-plaint in this case is opposed to the decision in Public Prosecutor v. Ratnavelu Chetty A.I.R. (1926) Mad. 865, and on the evidence...

P. Vs. Kurian V. Income-tax Officer, Ernakulam.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1961]43ITR432(Ker)

criminal jurisprudence must apply to these proceedings and nothing is more elementary at least in this country in crimianl jurisprudence than the principle that the burden of proving that the accused is guilty is always upon the

Mandavalli Satyanarayanamurthi Vs. Kotha Manikyala Rao

Court : Chennai

Subject : crimianl

Reported in : AIR1940Mad265

ORDERLakshmana Rao, J.1. The view of the Joint Magistrate that a partner cannot be convicted of criminal breach of trust under any circumstances is erroneous and the order of acquittal cannot be sustained. It is therefore...

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Champat Raj and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Crimianl

Reported in : 1983WLN(UC)438

1. Heard learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the record. No one is present on behalf of the respondents.2. The State has come up for enhancement of sentence of the respondents, who have been...

Syed HussaIn Vs. C.S. Munirathnam Chetty

Court : Chennai

Subject : Crimianl

Reported in : AIR1929Mad489a

Devadoss, J.1. This is an appeal against the conviction under Section 65 (2), City Municipal Act of 1919 by the Presidency Magistrate. The appellant went to the polling station on 17th September 1927 and applied for...

Rahamat Sheikh and anr. Vs. King-emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Crimianl

Reported in : AIR1927Cal593

Suhrawardy, J.1. This is an appeal by seven persons all of whom have been convicted under Section 147, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to two years' and one year's rigorous imprisonment and four of them (Appellants...

Rabindra Nath Dhar Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Crimianl

Reported in : AIR1933Cal332

Mitter, J.1. This rule was issued on the Chief Presidency Magistrate to show cause why the conviction of and the sentence passed on the petitioner Rabindra Nath Dhar under Section 294-A, I.P.C., should not be set...