Advanced Search Results

Md. Shah Afzal Vs Medical Council of India and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Indian Medical Council

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 39

Shah Afzal as the petitioner for the sake of convenience in all the three petitions and the Medical Council of India shall be referred to as the MCI, the other parties being the University of Delhi, which

Ess Ess College of Education Vs. National Council for Teacher Educatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : National Council for Teacher Education

Acts : National Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 - Rule 9

be reported Yes. in the Digest?ORDER.1. The petition entails interpretation of Regulation 7(1) & (1-A) of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition Norms & Procedure) Regulations, 2009 and which are as under:"7. Processing of Applications.(1) The

ishan Institute of Managemnet Vs National Council for Teacher Educatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : National Council for Teacher Education

Acts : National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993

today.2. The petitioner had applied on 30th December, 2003 to the Northern Regional Committee (NRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) established under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, for recognition for imparting

Mathrusree Educational Society Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : State Council of Higher Education

Acts : State Council of Higher Education Act, 1988 - Section 18 , 11

permission for starting private unaided degree colleges/courses and post graduate courses and that under the Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education Act, 1988 (for short '1988 Act'), respondent No.2 has powers to do certain academic functions

Basant Lal Memorial College of Eduucation Vs National Council for Teac ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : National Council for Teacher Education

Acts : National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Section 18

meeting held from 18th May to 20th May, 2010) of the Northern Regional Committee (NRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), derecognizing the B.Ed. and D.Ed. courses for imparting education in which the petitioner had

Shriom Dalal Vs. All India Council for Technical Education and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Council

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act,( AICTE)

people either on contract or on deputation for a term fixed.5. On 1.11.2007, AICTE notified the All India Council for Technical Education (Group A, B and C Posts) Recruitment Regulations 2007. Regulation 6 whereof reads as under:-

In Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 445

Reported in : [1951]2SCR747; AIR 1951 SC 332

authority in respect of areas which had come under the control of the East India Company. The Indian Councils Act of 1861, section 22, gave power to the Governor-General in Council, with additional nominated members, to make

Govt. Of Nct of Delhi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

239AA of the 3 Constitution………………………………………. 140­145 Q. Status of NCT of Delhi…………………………. 146­160 R. Executive power of the Council of Ministers of Delhi……………………………….. 160­164 S. Essence of Article 239AA of the Constitution……………………………………… 164­188 T. The Government of

B.Ashok Vs. 1. the Secretary,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

India, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.3. National Legal Knowledge Council, New Delhi.4. The Secretary, Bar Council of India, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhavan, New Delhi.5.

Nabam Rebia and Etc. Etc. Vs. Deputy Speaker and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of constitutional authority. The above order and message of the Governor, without the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers and the Chief Minister, constitute the foundation of the challenge raised by the appellants.3. When hearing