Advanced Search Results
Stephen Vs. Chandra Mohan and ors.
Kerala
Apr-04-1987
ContractCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 91, 190 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 2, 405, 409, 415 and 420; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 171
[1990]68CompCas636(Ker)
direction of law prescribing the mode in which the trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which the accused made touching on the discharge of such trust is also sufficient to … The short question for consideration is whether the facts constitute offences under the above sections.2. Section 409 involves criminal breach of trust by a public servant or by a banker, merchant or agent. In order to constitute
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Prasad Naik Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Oct-31-2008
ContractCriminal
2009(I)OLR270
Section 161 of the I.P.C.2. Prosecution case, in nut-shell, is as follows:P.W.1, the informant-decoy had earlier executed work contract of Nuagada-Maliguda road under Nandahandi Block as contractor at the estimated cost of Rs. 10,000/-. When the appellant … appellant is confined to acceptance of bribe on 28.04.1985. Section 5(2) of the P.C. Act provided punishment for criminal misconduct committed by public servant. The relevant provisions under Section 5 of the P.C. Act read:Section 5(1) A
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMoulvi Muhammad Ismail Vs. Samad Ali Bhuyan and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-17-1915
ContractCriminal
32Ind.Cas.227
of first instance on the point was affirmed, but then it was contended before that Court that the contracts were opposed to public policy as they were entered into for compounding a criminal case. The learned Subordinate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tarkeshwar Nath Katariyar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Jharkhand
Aug-06-2004
ContractCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 420
[2004(4)JCR57(Jhr)]
A, at the time of obtaining the money, intends to deliver the indigo plant, and afterwards breaks his contract and does not deliver it, he does not cheat, but is liable only to a civil action for … ORDERHari Shankar Prasad, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 12.8.2003 passed in Complaint Case No. 506 of 2003 whereby and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Bureau of Investigation Vs. Bhupen Champaklal Dalal and Others
Mumbai
Jan-18-2014
Land Acquisition
this case would require to be enumerated columnwise to show the payments made by BMC Bank upon the contract note of the brokers' bill of accused Nos.1 and 13, the demand draft (DD) issued by BMC Bank … be prudent to consider the aforesaid charges together against the accused separately. For considering the essential charge of criminal conspiracy under Section 120B of the IPC, it would have to be seen whether any and if so
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and anr. Vs. Brojo ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-1986
Service
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 23, 32, 36, 37, 38, 38(1), 39, 40, 41, 42, 47, 51, 51-A, 53(1), 68, 73, 131, 141, 152, 154, 154(1), 162, 226, 298, 308, 311, 311(2), 366, 367(1), 370 and 372; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16(1), 16(2), 19, 19-A, 23 and 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 19\7; Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. (Service, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rules 9 and 11; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1908 - Sections 21
AIR1986SC1571; (1986)3CompLJ1(SC); 1986LabIC1312; (1986)IILLJ171SC; 1986(1)SCALE799; (1986)3SCC156; [1986]2SCR278; 1986(2)SLJ320(SC); [1986] 2 SCR 178; AIR 1986 SC 157; MANU/SC/0439/1986
'the State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution? 2) Whether an unconscionable term in a contract of employment is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as being opposed to public … proceeding against him is contemplated or is pending or where a case against him in respect of any criminal offence is under investigation or trial. Rule 34 provides for payment of subsistence allowance during the period of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRobertson Vs. Baldwin
US Supreme Court
Jan-25-1897
Land Acquisition
of justices of the peace and other such officers to arrest and commit for a violation of the criminal law of the United States Page 165 U. S. 280 was held to be no part of the … than a part of it. Section 4598 and 4599, insofar as they require seamen to carry out the contracts contained in their shipping articles, are not in conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment forbidding slavery and involuntary servitude,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. United Mine Workers
US Supreme Court
Mar-06-1947
Land Acquisition
its officers from precipitating a nationwide strike in the bituminous coal mines pending judicial interpretation of a labor contract between the Government and the union, at a time when the mines are being operated by the Government … the purpose of preserving existing conditions pending a decision upon its own jurisdiction; and disobedience is punishable as criminal contempt. Pp. 330 U. S. 289 -295. 3. In this case, none of the procedural aspects of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC. Bala Krishnaiah Vs. A. Kannaiah (Died) and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-04-2007
Contract
Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14, 16, 17, 19 and 19A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 23, Rule 3 and 3A - Order 23(3)
2007(2)ALD281; 2007(2)ALT477
to grant such adjournment. Explanation - An agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule.Another significant … give up claim on the suit land, by receipt of money as compensation, I will be committed to criminal contempt and the Second Appeal was posted to 4-11-2003.(e) The respondents herein i.e. appellants in the Second Appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Bank of Lahore Ltd. Vs. Sohan Lal Saigal and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-11-1961
Banking
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 235 and 238; Indian Limitation Act - Articles 36, 49, 95 and 120; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Law; Roman Civil Law
AIR1962P& H534
in those lockers, could not be said to fall within the ambit of Section 238 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, nor were they of such a nature as could be regarded to have been done in … has based his argument principally on the legal liability of an employer or principal for the fraudulent and criminal acts of the employee or the agent. It is argued that the acts of the Manager, which were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »