Advanced Search Results
Svenska Handelsbanken Vs. M/S. Indian Charge Chrome and Others
Supreme Court of India
Oct-15-1993
ContractCommercial
Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 12(3), 13 and 59; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 41; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92
AIR1994SC626; 1994(1)ALT37(SC); I(1994)BC215(SC); 78(1994)CLT1(SC); [1994]79CompCas589(SC); (1994)1CompLJ145(SC); JT1993(6)SC189; 1993(4)SCALE124; (1994)1SCC502; [1993]Supp
the client. Nothing more nothing less. It made no mention of the professional capability of the suppliers.49. United Commercial Bank v. Bank of India and Ors. : [1981]3SCR300 , as it appears from its title, was a … period of about two years into the details of the proposed plant.9. On or about 28th September, 1984 contracts were entered into between the borrower (plaintiff) and the suppliers for setting up the power plant and for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentre Point Welfare Association Vs. Nita International
Gujarat
Mar-08-2001
ContractCommercial
Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act - Sections 10A, 159, 161, 253, 254, 254(1), 260, 260(1), 260(2), 263, 263(1) and 268; Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 7, 7(2) and 11; Registration Act, 1908; Urban Development Act, 1976; Gujarat Town Planning and Development Act; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19A and 65; Bombay Land Revenue Code - Sections 4, 4(5) and 57; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 32 and 226;Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Rules - Rule 10; Assam Land and Revenue and Local Rates Regulation
(2001)4GLR2777
they will not get peace on account of the nuisance and annoyance which is a necessary consequence of commercial use. When people are buying the property with the bonafide belief that they will have a good residential … tower no.1 in Centre Point, the building in question has been constructed by the builder / organisers / Contractor M/s. Hasmukh Shah in violation of the provisions of the B.P.M.C. Act and the building regulations framed thereunder
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTci Seaways Limited Vs. Food Corporation of India, Regional Officer Ha ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-07-2002
ContractCommercial
Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(6)ALD685; 2002(6)ALT760
Limited v. M. & N. Publications Limited, : AIR1996SC51 , this Court observed thus: '......... In contracts having commercial element, some more discretion has to be conceded to the authorities so that they may enter into contracts … Food Corporation of India, 1st respondent in the writ petition that the scope of judicial review in the contractual matters is very limited and that the technical aspects involved in the tenders cannot constitute the subject matter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Center for Public Interest Litigation and anr. Vs. Union of India and ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2000
ContractCommercial
Constitution of India - Article 14
2000(7)SCALE1; (2000)8SCC606
in October 1993, these two consortia were called for further negotiations by the Negotiating Committee to finalise the contract and after such negotiations and evaluation of the bids on the recommendations of the said Committee, the bid … almost similar grounds contending that the contract in question was awarded after a careful consideration of all the commercial/technical aspects of the contract bearing in mind the policy of the GOI in this regard and the contract
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhanu Constructions Company Limited, Rep. by Its Director, B. Prasad a ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-24-1997
ContractCommercial
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226
1997(6)ALT328
used for the purchase of eligible goods and services necessary for the implementation of the Project from Suppliers, Contractors or Consultants (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'the Supplier(s)') of the eligible source countries described in Schedule 4 … follows:'As the offer of M/s. Bhanu Construction Co, Hyderabad for Package 'A' is found to be technically and commercially responsive and also lowest amongst all the bidders, APSEB have proposed to place order on them.'However, the final
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir India Ltd. Vs. CochIn Int., Airport Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-31-2000
ContractCommercial
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2000SC801; (2001)1CALLT41(SC); 2000(1)CTC594; JT2000(1)SC481; (2000)IIMLJ72(SC); 1999(4)SCALE477a; (2000)2SCC617; [2000]1SCR505; 2000 INSC 39
the action of the Cochin International Airport Ltd. (for brevity sake referred to as the 'CIAL') of awarding contract for ground handling service at the new Cochin Airport at Nedumbassery to Air India Ltd. The learned single … whether it is by a private party or by a public body or the State, is essentially a commercial transaction. In arriving at a commercial decision considerations which are of paramount are commercial considerations. The State can
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGammon India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Nov-11-2002
ContractCommercial
Indian Arbitrators and Conciliation Act, 1996; ;Indian Contract Act - Sections 2 and 7
2003(1)ARBLR353(Delhi)
that the price bid is required to be unconditional for correct and fair comparison and award of the contract to the lowest bidder. The assumptions mentioned in the tender document thereforee, need to be withdrawn before opening … the tenderer in the equipment and not keeping the labour idle for long periods which is part of commercial prudence. The commercial aspect of each one of the offers made by the parties will have to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mateshwari Indrani Construction Company Private Limited Vs. the S ...
Rajasthan
May-26-2008
ContractCommercial
RLW2008(4)Raj3364
challenged cancellation of Notice Inviting Tender issued by the Dy. Commissioner (Administration), Commercial Taxes Department, Bhilwara for awarding contract on behalf of the State Government for collection of tax on minerals (Chheja Patthar) for Revenue Tehsil Bhilwara,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrecision Infratech Ltd. Rep. by the Authorised Signatory Amit Vibhaka ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-21-2009
ContractCommercial
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
2009(5)ALT702
petitioner questioned the action of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in qualifying respondent No. 4 for award of contract notified under tender notice No. CEC/Hydel/HD-IV/NSTPD/F.HMW/D. No. 66/2008, dated 16.06.2008. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to … Through letter dated 03.04.2009, the Chief Engineer (Civil Hydel) replied stating that respondent No. 4 has put-forth certain commercial deviations, which were analyzed as per Clause 24 of Part-II price bid detailed tender notice, duly indicating maximum
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrilokidas and ors. Vs. Firm Ram NaraIn Damodar and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-30-1970
ContractCommercial
Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rules 97 and 98; Contract Act - Sections 56; Sea Customs Act; Defence of India Ordinance
AIR1971Raj88
between the parties in terms of para. No. 2 of the plaint? 2. Whether in pursuance of the contract and past correspondence, an order for 10 Lakh carats white and one lakh carat of lemon colour imitation … to cripple the enemy's commerce as to capture his property, a declaration of war imports a prohibition of commercial intercourse and correspondence with the inhabitants of the enemy's country, and that such intercourse, except with the licence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »