Advanced Search Results

The Upper Ganges Valley Electricity Supply Company Ltd. Vs. the U.P. E ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : AIR1973SC683; (1973)1SCC254; [1973]3SCR107

was entitled to compensation for the 'service lines' which were laid with the help of contributions made by consumers. On this question, arbitrators were unable to agree and therefore they referred it to the decision of an

Samrakshana Propery Service Pvt Ltd vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Chennai

their men, agents from collecting current consumption charges, demand charges and any arrears from the petitioner’s group captive consumer M/s.Plaza Maintenance and Service Ltd., is having HTSC No.019094022245 until the respondents make payment of the outstanding dues

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Mansukh D. Patel

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 50; Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC), Electricity Supply Code and Related Matters Regulations, 2005

Reported in : AIR2008Guj1

bearing consumer No. 747609. The original plaintiff is having electricity connection in his own name, one is having consumer service No. 747609, (for this service, because of theft of electricity, supplementary bill has been issued by the appellant … company to the tune of Rs. 1,05,166.00ch has not been yet paid by the original plaintiff) and another consumer service No. 1324664 for which additional load of electricity is demanded and as the same was not given, the

Nimbkar Seeds Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Bhausaheb Radhu Palve

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. (Formerly Magma Leasing Limited) Vs. Rajesh Kum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

…..Respondent JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal is against an order dated 2nd August, 2018 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [hereinafter referred to as the ‘National Commission’]., dismissing Revision Petition No.5 of 2018, filed by … has received delivery of the Hired Article. b) MAINTENANCE Maintain and keep the Hired Article in good and serviceable condition at his own cost. The company and/or its Bankers shall have all the rights to inspect and

Central Hudson Gas and Elec. Vs. Public Svc. Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

& Elec. v. Public Svc. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557 (1980) Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York No. 79-565 Argued March 17, 1980 Decided June 20, 1980 447 U.S. 557 APPEAL … provides no protection from competition with substitutes for that product, advertising by utilities is just as valuable to consumers as advertising by unregulated firms, and there is no indication that appellant's decision to advertise was not based

Collector of Customs and Central Vs. General Marketing and Mfg. Co.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1994)(52)LC399Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Collr. of Cus. and C. Ex. Vs. General Marketing and Mfg. Co.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1994)(71)ELT106TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Binani Zinc Limited, Rep. by Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board,

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL868

at the expense of EHT categories and the tariff be re-determined. In order to ascertain the cost of service to EHT consumers, relevant information was sought by the Commission from the Board. According to the Board, the … in Binanipuram in the State of Kerala and it falls in the category of extra high tension industrial consumers of electricity. The Appellant is supplied power by the first Respondent Kerala State Electricity Board (for short KSEB).3.

Mr. Vishwanath Gangadhar Patankar, Miraj and Another Vs. Avadhoot Gas ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai