Advanced Search Results
Kalpana Vs. Secretary to Government
Chennai
Feb-21-2013
Education
and District Magistrate Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondents Prayer:- Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records pertaining to the order of … HCP. No.2191/2012 ----------------- Kalpana .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Department Fort St. George, Chenna”009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondents Prayer:- Habeas
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Hotel Royal Inn Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Aug-22-2017
Land Acquisition
R4 & R5; SRI.I.GOPALA KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE LETTER DATED0704.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE … 016 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT D.C.OFFICE BUILDING CHAMARAJA MOHALLA MYSURU - 570 005 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE MYSURU DISTRICT DATE OF ORDER :22.08.2017 in W.P. No.38772/2016 AND CONNECTED MATTERS M/S. HOTEL ROYAL INN. vs. THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskO.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise-ii, New Delh ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-04-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 11A(1), 11A(2), 11A(3) and 35L; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(2) and 173G; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 97, 97B and 110
AIR2005SC1031; 2005(98)ECC633; 2005(180)ELT291(SC); JT2005(2)SC208; (2005)2SCC555
to for the sake of brevity as 'the 1985 Act'). According to the show-cause notices, the aforestated process constituted 'manufacture' and the moulding powder constituted 'excisable goods' as defined under Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-17-2003
Excise
Uttar Pradesh Licences for the Possession of Denatured Spirit and Specially Denatured Spirit Rules, 1976 - Rules 2 and 3; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3(9), 3(11), 3(13) and 18G; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 40(1), 40(2) and 41; Oil and Alcohol Taxation (Amendment) Act, 1976; Ethyl Alcohol (Price Control) Orders; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 76; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 548
AIR2003SC4650; JT2003(8)SC1; 2003(8)SCALE775; (2004)1SCC225
noted the challenge of the industries to the State levy of tax on industrial alcohol succeeded before the Constitution Bench.13. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. then filed an application in WP No. 2423 of 1980 in which it … subjected to the disputed levy.5. The levy of the disputed licence fee is legislatively traceable to the UP Excise Act, 1910. This Act provides for the control of and levy of excise duty on intoxicating liquor and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Bihar and ors. Vs. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Private Lt ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-11-2005
Constitution Excise
Bihar Excise Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 2(6), 2(10), 2(13), 2(14), 2(15), 2(19), 2(12), 3, 5, 6, 13, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(4) 20, 22, 27, 30, 38, 56, 58, 66, 89, 89(2), 90, 90(7) and 90(9); Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955; Bihar Medicinal Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) (Amendment) Act, 1985; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 245, 246, 246(1), 246(2), 246(3), 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 254, 277 and 301; Bihar Excise Rules, 1919 -Rules 18, 21 and 33; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 103; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 33E, 33EE, 33EEA, 33EEB, 33EEC and 33I; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rules 153 and 158; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956; Hyderabad Abkari Act; Bihar
AIR2005SC932; 2005(1)BLJR179; 2005(191)ELT3(SC); [2005(1)JCR190(SC)]; JT2005(1)SC314; (2005)2SCC762
the legislative competence of the State Legislature in redefining the word 'intoxicant' in Section 2(12a) of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as 'the Bihar Act, 1915') by including therein … the manufacturers of Ayurvedic medicinal preparations containing alcohol like Mritsanjivani Sura and Mritsanjivani Sudha, challenged the validity and constitutionality of Section 2(12a)(iv) of the Bihar Act, 1915 (as amended), as also the power of the State Government
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadura Coats Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madurai
Chennai
Feb-08-1995
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1), 35 and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
1995(51)ECC55; 1995(79)ELT567(Mad)
of A. V. Venkateswaran Collector of Customs Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani and Another - : 1983ECR2151D(SC) a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that : 'The wide proposition that the existence of an alternative remedy … high tenacity yarn of polyamides or polyester. In Heading No. 59.02 in Chapter 59. Section XI of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, refer to the processed fabric. Section XI of the Act is titled Textiles and Textile
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrade Links Limited, New Delhi and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ...
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1982
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 32
AIR1982SC1137; 1982(1)SCALE486; (1982)2SCC337; [1982]3SCR755; 1982(14)LC411(SC)
1. There is no substance in this group of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution whereby the petitioners, who carry on business, inter alia, of the wholesale vend of beer and Indian Made … the State of U.P. on the strength of licences granted to them in Form FL-2 under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910, have challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 1(2), 3 and (5) of U.P. Excise (Amendment) Ordinance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.A. Asma Beevi Vs. Commissioner, Municipal Council, Ernakulam and anr ...
Kerala
Aug-11-1966
Direct Taxation
Constitution of India - Article 277; Replacement of Cochin Income-tax Act, 1961; Kerala Municipalities Act, 1960 - Sections 110(1); Finance Act, 1950; Cochin Municipal Act, 1113
AIR1968Ker31
rule 19, it reads as follows:--'Provided that if in the financial year immediately preceding the commencement of the Constitution of India any municipality was imposing profession tax at a rate higher than two hundred and fifty rupees … of certain Abkari enactments in force in the Slates concerned at the time the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations, Excise Duties') Act, 1955 was passed by Parliament, It has also to be noted that Section 21 of that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShinde Brothers Etc. Vs. Deputy Commissioner and ors., Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-26-1966
ConstitutionExcise
Constitution of India - Articles 245, 246, 246(3) and 265; Mysore Health Cess Act, 1962 - Sections 1, 3 and 4; Mysore Excise Act, 1901 - Sections 16 , 17 and 18
AIR1967SC1512; [1967]1SCR548b
High Court of Mysore, dated November 17, 1965, disposing of 49 petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, The High Court disposed of the petitions by one common judgment as identical questions of law were involved … M/s. Guruswami and Co.--hereinafter referred to as the petitioner--filed writ petition alleging that the firm was a licensed Excise contractor with its principal office at Bangalore, and that it had been the licensee of the Bangalore Urban
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdhyaksha Mathur Babu's Sakti Oushadhalaya Dacca (P) Ltd. and Ors. Vs. ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-07-1962
Constitution
Excise Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 19(2); Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 277; West Bengal Excise Rules - Rules 65 and 68
AIR1963SC622; [1963]3SCR957
Wanchoo, J.1. These six petitions under Art. 32 of the constitution raise a common point and will be dealt with together. The main question raised in all these petitions … Ayurvedic preparations, namely Mirtasanjibani, Mritasanjibani Sudha and Mritasanjibani Sura, which are manufactured by these petitioners, under the various Excise Act in force in the respective States. Further points were raised in the petitions as regards the validity
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »