Advanced Search Results

Ms.A.R.S. Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Bo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

Writ Petition No.15238 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned … in H.T.Sc.No.1781 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the Regulation 5(5)(ii)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004 and consequently direct the second respondent to adjust and refund, as contemplated under Regulation 5(5)(v)

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

General Along with Mr. T.K. Vedamurthy, AGA) **** These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declaring that Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act has already been read down by … & 16929-16940/2017, W.P.Nos.20454-20465/2017, W.P.Nos.26337-26348/2017, W.P.Nos.26361-26372/2017, W.P.Nos.26779-26790/2017, W.P.Nos.26899-26910/2017, W.P.Nos.27451/2017 & Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 2/123 32900-32910/2017, W.P.Nos.10544/2017 & 10977- 10987/2017, W.P.Nos.14220-14231/2017,

Bihar State Electricity Board, and anr. Vs. Ram Deo Prasad Singh, and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Section 89; Reorganisation Act - Section 62; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 ; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9 Rule 4; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ; Industrial Establishment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

to Bihar State Electricity Board, State Warehousing Corporation and State Road Transport Corporation.- (1) The following bodies corporate constituted for the existing State of Bihar, namely:- (a) the State Electricity Board constituted under the Electricity Supply Act,

1.K.Vairamuthu Vs. 1.The President,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Board) Karaikudi, Sivagangai..Respondents in all W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.13391 of 2014 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the … 2014 Vs 1.The President, Sankarapuram Panchayat, Sankarapuram, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO (Rural).(Formerly Tamil Nadu Electricity Board) Karaikudi, Sivagangai..Respondents in all W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.13391 of 2014 Petition filed under Article 226 of the

Electricity Employment Union Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectricityService

Acts : Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 67(3), 81, 82, 83 and 84

Reported in : AIR2000SC2995; JT2000(10)SC19; (2001)ILLJ608SC; 2000(6)SCALE170; (2000)7SCC339; [2000]Supp3SCR1; (2000)3UPLBEC2781

before the reorganisation of the State of Punjab. Subsequently a new State Electricity Board (for short 'Board') was constituted by the successor State of Punjab and it is not disputed that the members of the appellant Electricity

Arun Kumar Trivedi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 62

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR97(Jhr)]

as to Bihar State Electricity Board, State Warehousing Corporation and State Road Transport Corporation.--(1) The following bodies Corporate constituted for the existing State of Bihar, namely :-- (a) the State Electricity Board constituted under the Electricity (Supply)

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Kalyan Borough Municipality an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 5, 16, 16(1), 18, 49, 49(1) to 49(3), 49(4), 57, 59, 61, 63, 67, 70(2) and 80; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 11 and 24; Constitution of India - Article 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 75, 75(1), 78(2), 78A(1) and 79; Maharashtra Electricity (Supply) Rules, 1963 - Rule 57; Electricity Act, 1947 - Sections 37(8); Victorian Electric Light and Power Act, 1896 - Sections 39

Reported in : AIR1968SC991; (1968)70BOMLR733; 1969MhLJ32(SC); [1968]3SCR137

such power to the Board, it was ultra vires and void, as it offended the provisions of the Constitution. 6. The Board, by reference to the scheme and the provisions of Supply Act, contended that the levy … each of these two appeals, may be briefly stated. Till January 14, 1959, a company called the Kalyan Electricity Company (Private) Ltd., held a licence for supplying electrical energy to the town of Kalyan and the surrounding

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

judgments of this Court have held that tariff determination is a quasi-judicial exercise (see PTC India v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission18, BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission19, Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd v. Union of … impleaded as a party to an appeal against its order is premised on two reasons, both rooted in constitutional philosophy. The first reason is that with the impleadment of the judicial or quasi-judicial authorities as respondents, they

Uttaranchal Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL182

& Modifications Act i.e. 01.01.2002 and (2) from the date of the Adaptation & Modification Act till the constitution of the Uttaranchal Electricity Regulatory Commission viz. 05.09.2002. In the first period, Section 43A(2) did not apply to

Jackson Vs. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

which holds a certificate of public convenience issued by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission empowering it to deliver electricity to a service area which includes the city of York, Pa. As a condition of holding its certificate, … its deprivation was consistent with due process, see Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U. S. 134 (1974), are themselves constitutional questions which we find no occasion to reach in this case. [ Footnote 3 ] Section 1 of