Advanced Search Results

B.Murugan Vs. Secretary of the Bar Council of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

High Road, Thiruverkadu, Chennai  600 077. ... Respondents in all W.Ps. Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. For petitioners : Mr.S.Prabakaran for Mr.T.P.Senthil Kumar. For respondent 1 : Mr.S.R.Raghunathan, for Mr.S.R.Rajagopal. For respondent … Attendance for particular subject Shortage of attendance Overall attendance B.Murugan (Petitioner in W.P.311/2014) Jurisprudence-II083 - Motor Vehicles and Consumer Protection Act 0.75 0.05 Constitutional Law-III076 0.04 Special Contracts 0.76 0.04 78.70% V.Karthikeyan (Petitioner in W.P.312/2014) Jurisprudence-II085 -

N.Mohamed Kani Vs. Secretary of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, T.Nagar, Chennai-17. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to assess the correct electricity consumption … dispute now raised, regarding calculation of the Current Consumption Charges and that there is a separate forum, viz., Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, as per Regulation No.6 of the Regulations for

Granholm Vs. Heald

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

against out-of-state liquor. More recent cases confirm that the Twenty-first Amendment does not supersede other provisions of the Constitution and, in particular, does not displace the rule that States may not give a discriminatory preference to their … for producers, wholesalers, and retailers. These schemes allow in-state, but not out-of-state, wineries to make direct sales to consumers. This differential treatment explicitly discriminates against interstate commerce by limiting the emerging and significant direct-sale business. Influenced by

All India Lawyers Union (Delhi Unit) Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 32, 39, 41, 42, 47, 226 and 256

Reported in : 172(2009)DLT319

inaction of both the respondents is adversely affecting the mandates of Articles 21, 39(e), 41, and 47 of Constitution of India. In course of proceedings, the Union of India and the Delhi Development Authority were also impleaded … increased production or at any rate reduce absenteeism on the ground of sickness.38. In a subsequent judgment in Consumer Education & Research Center v. Union of India : (1995) 3 SCC 42 the Court dealt with the

Torrent Power Aec Ltd. Vs. Gayatri Intermediates Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 1 to 120 and 122 to 185; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(2), 26(6), 39 to 50; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 173; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulations) Act, 2003; Electricity (Supply) Rules, 1948; Electricity Rules, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Electricity Supply Code - Sections 7; Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply code and Related matters) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 7, 7.1 to 7.4, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2 to 7.6.4, 7.6.5 to 7.6.8 and 7.7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1) and 226

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1580

Supply framed under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 was neither violative of Articles 20(1) and 14 of the Constitution nor violative of the principles of natural justice. The Court further held that the provision for a departmental … (c) of the Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the installation will be liable for disconnection.If the consumer pays the amount of assessment for the theft of electricity, the licensee shall forthwith restore the connection.7.6.7 In

Dr. A.S. Chandra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConsumerService

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 14(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23(2); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT713

the Act, it was contended that the same would be unconstitutional being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. It was also pleaded that the consumer forum is not the proper forum to decide the question since

State of U.P. and Ors Vs. All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Ass.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

With WRIT PETITION (C) No.164 OF2002JUDGMENT Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J1The deficiency of infrastructure in the adjudicatory fora constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has led to several directions of this Court in the course of

Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Association and Others Vs. State of Kerala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32 and 366; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 9; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939; Kerala Finance Acts, 1987; Kerala Finance Acts, 1988; Constitution (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution (Fortysixth Amendment) Act, 1982

Reported in : AIR1990SC913; (1990)2CompLJ119(SC); JT1990(1)SC324; 1990(1)KLT825(SC); 1990(1)SCALE252; (1990)2SCC502; [1990]1SCR516; [1990]77STC253(SC); 1990(1)LC754(SC)

substantially common question arising out of the conflicting decisions of the High Courts of Kerala and Madras regarding constitutional validity of similar provisions in the States of Kerala and Tamil Nadu which result in imposition of sales … not otherwise. In other words, the contention is that this tax burden which is ultimately borne by the consumers of cooked food must be shared equally by all consumers and it cannot be placed only on the

Ranbaxy Laboratories Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 79; Electricity Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR2004P& H137

the Jurisdiction of the Civil Court will be ousted to entertain the suit. Reliance was placed on the Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Kamla Mills Limited v. State of Bombay. AIR 1965 SC … the appellant, argued that the Board cannot create Dispute Settlement Committee to adjudicate upon the disputes between the consumers and the Board as there is no statutory provision under which such Dispute Settlement Committee could be established.

Binod Behari Das Vs. Smt. Soma Roy and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConsumerConstitutionConsumer

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227;; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 17 and 21

Reported in : AIR1996Cal231

it be ' recorded. Considered the materials on record.2. By the instant application under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, O. P. No. 2 before the State Commission has come up before this Court challenging the … as a complainant filed an application for compensation for deficiency of medical service under S. 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, before the West Bengal State Commission Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhabani Bhavan, Calcutta, on 8-6-95 and