Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: constitution commercial · Page 1 of about 30,486 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 06 2016

Korangrapady Co-Operative Agricultural Society Ltd Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-06-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

KING & PARTRIDGE, FOR R2; NOTICE TO R3 DISPENSED WITH) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CLAUSE NO.2 (vi) OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED811.2016 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE … BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE -A IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND DIRECT THE DCCBs/NATIONALIZED/ COMMERCIAL BANKS UNDER THE CONTROL OF R-2 TO COMPENSATE THE PETITIONERS BY GRANTING SUITABLE RATE OF INTEREST FOR IN

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1993

Baba Associates Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-1993

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 22(4), (6), 22A, 22A(1), 22A(2), 23 and 25A; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 55

Reported in : ILR1994KAR28

the petitioner, relied upon McDowell's case : [1977]1SCR914 , the respondent relied upon the later decision of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in McDowell & Company Limited v. Commercial Tax Officer reported in : [1985]154ITR148(SC)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2017

M/S Ws Retail Services Private Limited Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

SRI VIKRAM HULIGOL, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THE CONSTITUTION OF IMPUGNED ORDER AND CONSEQUENTIAL DEMAND NOTICE DATED296.2017 PERTAINING TO DEMAND OF KVAT FOR THE PERIOD201112 AT ANNEX-A, … & Others AND:1. 2.3. 2/88 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AUDIT)-4.3 DVO-4, VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA-2 KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 047. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (AUDIT)-4.4, DVO-4, VTK-42

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 03 2023

Kaushal Kishor Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Govt. Of U.p. Home Secre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

speech which is false, misleading, unfair, deceptive and which proposes illegal transactions in USA. But, under the Indian Constitution, commercial speech which is deceptive, unfair, misleading and untruthful, would be hit by Article 19(2) of the Constitution and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2021

Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. Vs. Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-14-2021

Subject : Arbitration

application being R/Special Civil Application No.10492 of 2021 in the Gujarat High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Commercial Court.18. The said application under Article 227 of the Constitution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2014

1.K.Vairamuthu Vs. 1.The President,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-13-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

his name and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to change the electricity service connection of the petitioner from commercial Tariff into Domestic Tariff. Prayer in W.P.No.13395 of 2014 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of … Board) Karaikudi, Sivagangai..Respondents in all W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.13391 of 2014 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2018

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-10-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

General Along with Mr. T.K. Vedamurthy, AGA) **** These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declaring that Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act has already been read down by … Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 3/123 The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Audit-2.4) Room No.606, 6th floor, VTK-2 (‘B’ Block) 80 Feet Road Near National Games Village Koramangala, Bengaluru-560

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 1951

S. Ananthakrishnan Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-19-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Articles 25 and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13, 14, 19(1), 265, 268, 269 and 276

Reported in : AIR1952Mad395; (1952)1MLJ208

1.This is an application made under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner is a Law Graduate of the Madras University. According to the statements made in his affidavit … from religious adherents engaged in the sale of religious books and pamphlets through the ordinary methods used in commercial canvassing. The 'ratio decidendi' of the decision of the Court is contained in the opinion delivered by Mr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2016

Sonal Apparel Private Ltd., Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-29-2016

Subject : Service Tax

for Shri S.V.Giri Kumar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondents) These Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to a) issue a writ, order or direction, reading down provisions of Sections 10[3]. of … the Principal Secretary - Finance Department, Government of Karnataka, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore 560 001. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Audit) - 6.5, DVO-06, KIADB, 3rd Block, 14th Cross, Peenya Industrial Area, 4th Phase, Bangalore 560 058.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2019

M/S. Mfar Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Comme ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-06-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties M/S. Mfar Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial