Advanced Search Results

Oriental Metal Pressing Works (Private) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bhaskar Kash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(12), 2(13), 2(26), 9 and 312;

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1045

learned counsel for the appellants was that secion 317 prevents appointment of a managing director of a public compnay for a term exceeding five years at a time. But that section has no bearing of his office

United Breweries (Holdings) Limited Vs. Bangalore International Airpor ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.19524/2013 (GM-CPC) C/W C.R.P.NO.193/2013 W.P.No.19524/2013 BETWEEN: UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LIMITED, A COMPNAY INCORPORATED UNDER PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT LEVEL-15, UB TOWER, UB CITY VITTAL

Ex Nk Ravi Kumar Pola Vs. the Union of India, Through Secretary and Ot ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Criminal

then left. He would further depose that approximately at 21.30 hours Sepoy Chandra Mohan, the ‘Sahayak of the Compnay Commander, ie., the deceased came to him with snacks and enquired him if he had noticed any movement,

The Assessing Officer, vs Choice Canning Compnay,

Court : Kerala

ALI ROAD, COCHIN- 682018. BY SRI. MOHAMMED RAFEEQ - SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT:- (PETITIONER IN THE W.P.(C))CHOICE CANNING COMPNAY, (A DIVISION OF CHOICE TRADING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED), 21/1391-A, THANGAL NAGAR, NEAR PASHNITHODU PALAM, PALLURUTHY, COCHIN- 682006, REPRESENTED

Thoufeeq Vs. M/S.Shriram Transport Finance Compnay Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

P O, MUNDAKKAYAM, KOTTAYAM DIST BY ADVS.SRI.NOEL JOSEPH SMT.MERIL MUTHU P.JOHN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTNO.2 &STATE/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPNAY LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE123 A N STREET, CHENNAI I, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, K. P. AJI, AGED APPROXIMATELY33YEARS,

Nalam Satya Prasada Rao and ors. Vs. Vinipamula Lakshmi Narasihma Sast ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 220, 397, 398, 406, 408, 539, 540, 541, 542 and 543

Reported in : [1991]70CompCas303(AP)

and pleading that by merely amending article 48 of the articles of the association of the sizxth respondent compnay, the third and fourth respondents cannot be made permanent directors. 9. On the above pleadings, the following issues

Digital Infotainment Pvt. Ltd and Another Vs. M/S Anush Satellite N/W ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

that you will execute the said Memorandum of Agreement on 19.8.2009 however once again you have deceived the Compnay by not keeping your promises and avoided executing the said MOA even on 19.08.2009. We have followed up

M/S Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd vs. M/S Fernas Construction Comp ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Adv. with Mr.Abhay Raj Varma, Mr.Ashish Joshi, Ms.Priyanka Ghosh, Mr.Himanshu and Mr.Nikhil Arya, Advs. versus M/S FERNAS CONSTRUCTION COMPNAY INC & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Krishna Chandra Dubey, Adv. with Mr.Bharat Saini, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Sandeep Mr.Ashish

New Saurashtra Vanaspati Co., Morvi Vs. B.A. Maharaja, Sales Tax Offic ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(11), 2(19), 3, 19, 19(1) and 19(4)

Reported in : [1969]24STC92(Guj)

Mehta, J. 1. The petitioner, New Saurashtra Vanaspati Company, Morvi, challenges under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the order dated 5/6th April 1968, holding the petitioner-firm to be a successor of the Commercial Sales...

V. Balachandran Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 10A, 10E, 10E(2), 10F, 17, 18, 19, 49(10), 79, 141, 155, 186, 203, 240, 303, 388B, 397, 398, 401, 402, 403, 404, 406 and 642; Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14 and 226; Company Law Board Members (Qualifications and Experience) Rules, 1989 - Rules 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 5 and 10

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas67(Mad)

to casuse serious injury or damage to the interest of the trade, industry or business to which such compnay pertains or intended to defrasud creditors, members or any other persons or otherwise for a fraudulent or unlawful