Advanced Search Results

Prem Nath Diesels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Aloka Dam

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 13(1); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 106; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 49

for eviction from the suit premises alleging inter alia, in the plaint that the plaintiff inducted the defendant company as monthly tenant in respect of the ground floor fiat of premises No. 43, Jhowtola Road, at present … for a period of 3 years from 1st of July, 1980 to 30th June, 1983 as per the tenancy agreement dated 21st June, 1980. Subsequently, after the expiration of the said period of tenancy, at the request

A.R.C. Parcel Service Private Ltd. Vs. A.V.Rajasekharan

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, TATABAD, COIMBATORE R.RAMASWAMY, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER S/O.MULLIPURAM RAMASWAMY GOUNDER, MANAGER ARC PARCEL SERVICES PVT.LTD., COMPANY ERNAKULAM RESIDING AT 'KARIKUZHUYIL HOUSE' KATTACHIRA, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADVS.SRI.N.DHARMADAN (SR.) SMT.D.P.RENU SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 1ST RESPONDENT: … landlord and hence objectionable. There subsists no landlord/tenant relationship between the landlord and the petitioner herein. Originally, the tenancy was between the first respondent's father Balakrishna Pillai and the landlord's father Varadarajalu. Later, the rent deed was

Rajas R. Doshi Vs. Eighth Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1994)48ITD77(Mum.)

that there is no bar against the company purchasing a flat and giving it to a director-employee on tenancy basis. Even if this is considered as an amenity to the director which could perhaps be taxed under … Pvt. Ltd. The assessee's father, Sri Ratanchand Hirachand, was a director probably from the very inception of the company. In the year 1962, the company purchased three4 flats and they were let out to the directors. One

Rajas R. Doshi Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1994)48TTJ(Mumbai)187

that there is no bar against the company purchasing a flat and giving it to a director-employee on tenancy basis. Even if this is considered as an amenity to the director which could perhaps be taxed under … Pvt. Ltd. The assessees father Sri Ratanchand Hirachand was a director probably from the very inception of the company. In the year 1962, the company purchased three flats and very were let out to the directors. One

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Represented by Its Area Accounta ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1989)2MLJ530

property belonged to their grandmother D.Mariakannu Ammal and on and from 1-1-1956, Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Limited, Madras (hereinafter referred to as 'Burmah Shell Oil Storage Company, for short) the first defendant … Rs. 300 to be adjusted as per the terms of the agreement in the last months of the tenancy, will be adjusted in the last quarter ending with December, 1975 and that deducting this amount. Burmah Shell

Blue Print and 13 ors. Vs. Blue Great Eastern Hotels Authority and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;;Great Eastern Hotel (Acquisition Undertaking) Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 3(1), (2) and (A) and 4 (1), (7) and (8);;West Bengal P.T. (Tenancy Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 6A;;Great Eastern Hotel (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1975;;Great Eastern Hotel (Acquisition of Undertaking) Act, 1989;;West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act, 1972;;West Bengal Government Premises (Tenancy Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT450(HC)

of Management) Act 1975, the Governments of West Bengal took over the Management of the Undertaking of the Company, i.e.. The Great Eastern Hotel Limited and appointed an Administrator for managing the Undertaking of the Company.1975 Act. … restore such possession, the prescribed authority or any officer authorised in this behalf is empowered by the 1976 Tenancy Regulation Act, to take such steps and use such force, as may be necessary to recover such possession

Smt. Nirmala R. Bafna/Kershi Shivax Cambatta and Others Vs. Khandesh S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CompanyTenancy

Reported in : AIR1993SC1380; [1992]74CompCas1(SC); (1992)2CompLJ9(SC); 1992(1)SCALE485

According to her, she entered into an agreement with the company on July 15, 1979 whereunder a sub tenancy was created in her favour in respect of the said flat except for a small area of 150 … at the instance of a creditor. The order of winding up was passed on September 19, 1984 in Company Petition No. 59 of 1984. The official liquidator was appointed as the liquidator for the company.4. The company

Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Biswanath Sonar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act - Sections 9(1)

Reported in : AIR1967SC77; [1966]SuppSCR15

in respect of a piece of land with a rent of Rs. 4/- per month. According to the Company the tenancy commenced in December 1938 and according to the tenant in the beginning of 1935. The two

Hind Estate Ltd. Vs. Grant James Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33; ;West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Sections 5, 9 and 9(2)

Reported in : AIR1953Cal20,56CWN566

of which Rule No. 3265 arises, the tenant is Grant James Limited and the suite occupied by the Company is situated on the fourth floor and consists of four living rooms with mosaic floor and colour-wash walls, … by the Additional Rent Controller, Sri K. P. Chattoraj, by which he fixed the standard rent for two tenancies on applications made by the respective tenants. The petitioner in the Rules before us is the landlord. 2.

R. Chandramouleeswaran and ors. Vs. P. Vasudevan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : City Tenants Protection Act - Sections 2(4), 9 and 11; Burma Shell (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1976

Reported in : (2007)2MLJ874

the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that in the instant case, originally, there was a tenancy agreement between the plaintiffs 4 and 5, their brother one Ramachandran and Burmashell Oil Storage and Distribution Company … said Ramachandran along with his brothers entered into a lease agreement with one Burmashell Oil Storage and Distribution Company for a period of 10 years; that it was subsequently extended; that thereafter, there was no extension; that