Advanced Search Results

Electric Lamp Manufacturers (India) P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central E ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1) and 4(4); ;Indian Companies Act, 1913; ;Central Excise (Amendment) Act 1973; ;Central Excise (Amendment) Act 1975; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Central Excise Rules - Rule 173B and 173C; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1980CENCUS544D,1981(8)ELT37(Cal)

favoured buyer for the following reasons :(1) The appellant is not a shareholder of any of the customer company nor any of the customer company is a shareholder of the appellant.(2) The price charged by the appellant … From the very commencement of the business, the appellant has been. selling its products only to a few customer companies namely Philips (India) Limited, General Electric Co. of India Limited, Crompton Greaves Limitedand prior to the amalgamation

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Turpentine and ResIn Co.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(41)ELT678TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

N K Proteins Limited and anr. Vs. Union of IndiA.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of the Food Adulteration Rules - Rules13(3). 3(2), 2B(1). 18, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 3; Customs Act - Section 110.

final hearing and is finally disposed of by this judgment.4. By this petition, the petitioner, a Public Limited Company, seeks the following substantive relief:"[10] Under the circumstances, petitioners most respectfully pray that:[A] Your Lordships may be pleased … assessment and release of the goods in question. The petitioner, in its letter dated 4.9.2010 addressed to the Customs Department, stated that after the cargo is released, the same would be refined at its factory under the

Pacl India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11AA, 11AA(1), 11AA(2) and 12(1B); Securities and Exchange Board of India Regulations, 1999 - Regulation 5(1)

Reported in : II(2004)BC331; [2004]120CompCas470(Raj); (2004)4CompLJ271(Raj); [2004]49SCL250(Raj)

of the petitioner in writ petition No. 6735/99, filed by PACL India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') is that the petitioner is a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act having its registered office … its development spread over for a period from 5 to 10 years, depending upon the choice of the customers at the time of entering into agreement.6. The questions for our consideration in both the petitions are that:--'(i)

Donald and Macarthy (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 48, 49, 52, 59 and 111; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 17, 17(3) and 17(4); ;Harbours, Docks and Piers Clauses Act, 1847; ;Drug's Act; ;Import (Control) Order, 1955; ;Madras Port Trust Act, 1905

Reported in : 1997(89)ELT53(Cal)

Company, it authorised one Shri Om Prakash Chowdhury, Advocate, as its lawful Attorney to represent it before the Customs authorities, Courts in India and/or any other Government authority, or body, relating to and/or in connection with any … ORDERAltamas Kabir, J.1. The writ petitioner Company claims to be incorporated under the relevant laws of Singapore and carries on business of import and export

Cybertech Systems and Software Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)3SOT121(Mum.)

is eligible for the deduction under section 80HHE of the Income Tax Act, 1961? The assessee is a company incorporated in India on 19-1-1995, under the name and style of M/s. Cybertech Systems & Software Limited (CSSL). … from Unisys amounted to consideration for production of new programmes, there was no export as there was no customs clearance.The eligibility for Customized electronic data for deduction under section 10B of the Act has been specifically provided

Cybertech Systems and Software Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)106TTJ(Mum.)257

is eligible for the deduction under Section 80HHE of the IT Act, 1961? 3. The assessee is a company incorporated in India on 19th Jan., 1995, under the name and style of M/s Cybertech Systems & Software … India by "any other means". This implies that the statute makes a distinction between exports and transmission without customs clearance. Thus, for the eligibility of deduction under Section 10B of the Act in terms of provisions as

The Central Bank of India, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Prov ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : BankingCompany

Reported in : 2008(5)KCCRSN651

jointly and severally against the defendants.4. According to the plaintiff, the second defendant which is a Private Limited Company had applied for two terra loans with the plaintiff for setting up of a Small Scale Industry at … issues:1. Whether the plaintiff proves the first Defendant colluded in violating the advise by plaintiff made to pay customs duty of Rs. 8,41,5B0/- Demurrage Rs. 1,23,553-73. Expenditure of Rs. 2,750/- and Rs. 6,950/-towaxds insurance and Rs. 2,300/-

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Orissa

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(39), 14, 107, 108, 108(1) and 111; Imports and Exports Control Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 - Rules 4 and 9; Project Import Regulations, 1986; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 74(1992)CLT553; 1992(39)ECC72; 1995(75)ELT501(Ori)

under Section 108 are not satisfied.2. The brief facts are that petitioner No. 1 is a public limited company and petitioners 2 to 5 are its officers. An agreement was entered into between the petitioner-Company and one … documents mentioned in the Schedule annexed to the summons in exercise of powers under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, by the Superintendents (Customs), Central Excise & Customs, Bhubaneswar, annexed as Annexures -12 to 15, is

Amar Chemical Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1991)LC49Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi