Advanced Search Results

M/S. Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. M/S. Belganga Sahakari Sakhar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : ILR1992Delhi601

Court in Centax (India) Ltd., : AIR1986SC1924 (supra) where the appellant entered into a contract with the respondent company of Singapore for supply of certain goods to it. The contract, inter alias stipulated that the bills of

Smt. Claude-lila Parulekar Vs. Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 36, 43A, 81, 81(3), 100 to 104, 108, 108(1), 153, 155, 155(1), 173, 188 and 402; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 and 100; Arbitration Act, 1940; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950; Indian Trusts Act, 1982 - Sections 6, 51, 52 and 57A; Sales of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 9(1), 10(1), 11 and 32

Reported in : AIR2005SC4074; II(2005)BC542(SC); 2006(3)BomCR429; [2005]124CompCas685(SC); (2005)4CompLJ193(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ465(SC); JT2005(3)SC523; (2005)11SCC73; [2005]59SCL414(SC); 200; [2005] 2 SCR 1063

Parulekar and his wife Shanta, started a Newspaper called Sakal. In 1948, Dr. Parulekar and Shanta promoted a company known as M/s. Sakal Papers Pvt. Limited, which is the respondent No. 1 and is referred to hereafter … 225 and 226 of 1988 before the Court in Pune against the respondents seeking specific performance of the contracts of sale of 3417 and 93 shares to them. Alternatively for damages by way of compensation of Rs.3

Smt. Sharda Mahajan Vs. Maple Leaf Trading International (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 433, 434(1) and 439; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Contract Act - Sections 32, 56 and 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 60 - Order 37

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas718(Delhi); (2007)2CompLJ455(Del); [2007]78SCL367(Delhi)

the Act) has been filed against Maple Leaf Trading International (P) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent Company), by Smt. Sharda Mahajan, (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner).2. After filing of the present petition notice was … case of the parties that the petitioner had made payment of Rs. 60,000/- (Rs.15000/- each under four separate contracts) to the respondent company on 5th May, 1999. These payments have been made under a document called agreement

Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. Vs. O.L. of Polysteels Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 125 and 125(4); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(3), 16, 17, 18, 19, 19(2), 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 30, 31, 32 and 33; Benjamin's Sale of Goods Act, 1987 - Sections 17 and 18; Ramaiya's Sale of Goods Act, 1995 - Sections 19; Civil Proceducer Code - Order 13, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 7, Rule 7 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3377

in annexure-A to the plaint.2. The facts giving rise to this petition are as under:-2.1 The plaintiffs are company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913 carrying on business, inter alia, as manufacturers and sellers of furnace and … carrying on business, inter alia, as mild and special steel manufacturers. Plaintiffs averred in the suit that a contract was entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants as contained in the letter dated 15-11-1973 Ex. 33

Taprogge Gesellschaft Mbh Vs. Iaec India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 51; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Indian Law; Vegetable Oils and Oilcakes (Forward Contracts Prohibition) Order, 1944

Reported in : AIR1988Bom157

ORDER1. The plaintiff company, engaged in the business of manufacturing cooling water filters and allied products, incorporated under the laws of the … the latter was to sell in India the covered products manufactured by Taprogge Ludwig. Clause 13.1 of the contract of agency which imposes trade restriction on the defendant reads as under :--'The agent must not recommend, offer,

Shiromani Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Debi Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 30, 30(2), 38, 86, 93 and 101; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 18 and 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR1950All508

the opposite parties. The grounds with which we are concerned in these applications were (1) that the original contract for the purchase of the shares was procured by the promoters of the Company by fraudulent misrepresentation, (2) … the learned Small Cause Court Judge and tried together. He delivered one judgment dismissing all the suits.2. The Company which was a public limited Company was formed with a large number of objects, the first and most

Continental Construction Ltd. and anr. Vs. Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 42; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2006(1)ARBLR321(Delhi)

has submitted while relying upon other judgments as well as recent judgment of this court in Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. OMP No. 213/2005 decided on November 24, 2005 that the present … cannot go into the matters or disputes which directly or indirectly touching upon the clause of the underlining contract while considering an application for grant of injunction. Such an approach is impermissible in law. (d) The judgment

Hind Techno Machines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jaipur Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CompanyContract

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN580

stated by the petitioner that he was ready and willing to supply the material, but the breach of contract was committed by the respondent Company by not making the payment of the aforesaid bills despite repeated requests. … of the Companies Act, 1956, the petitioner, M/s. Hind Techno Machines Pvt. Ltd. has prayed that the respondent Company M/s. Jaipur Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd, be ordered to be wound up by this Court.2. The facts of

State of Rajasthan Vs. Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Bundi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 14, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 1; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 55; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 93, 98 and 115; Constitution of India - Articles 13(3); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 84; Constract Act, 1872 - Sections 56 and 65

Reported in : AIR1970Raj36

by the then Ruler of the former State of Bundi was a sovereign act and not a commercial contract, and at any rate the monopoly rights of the Company had not been disturbed by the State but … be called the State) arises out of a suit filed by it against the defendant Bundi Electric Supply Company Limited, Bundi (which will hereinafter be referred to as 'the Company') in the Court of Senior Civil Judge,

New Standard Bank Ltd., by B.K. Dutta, Managing Director Vs. Probodh C ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CompanyContract

Reported in : AIR1942Cal87

1. The facts which are not in dispute in these two appeals are these : A limited company named House of Labourers Ltd., was incorporated in the year 1926. Another Company named Steel Construction Co. Ltd., … First Subordinate Judge's Court, Comilla; and (b) That this scheme is not to be regarded as novation of contract or as a discharge so far as the joint debtor with Steel Construction Co. Ltd. to New Standard