Advanced Search Results

Shri Chandrakant Kantilal Shah Vs. National Refinery Private

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2004)51SCL387

1. The substantive allegations in this petition filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") in relation to the affairs of M/s. National Refinery Private Limited ("the Company") are

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2004)49SCL117SAT

Marine Engineering and Construction Ltd.,(SEAMEC) is a public limited company registered in India under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the business of operating multi support vessels for diving and for providing

Baldevdas R. Raheja Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR581

purchasing shares in the open market as well as through the Life Insurance Corporation on behalf of the companies held or controlled by them or through their own relations, nominees, agents or brokers. The shareholding in the

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 2(1), 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 10, 10(1), 10(2), 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(1), 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(4), 22, 23, 33, 33(2), 34, 36, 37, 37(2) and 39; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(11), 6, 7(1), 9(2), 10, 11, 11(2), 11B, 12, 15H, 15K, 15T(2), 15Y, 15Z, 16(2), 18(5), 20, 20A, 21, 24, 27, 27(3), 28, 30, 32, 38, 87, 108, 111, 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(9), 111(10), 111(12), 111(14), 111A, 111A(2), 111A(3), 111A(5), 155, 155(1), 155(3), 169, 397, 398, 538, 545, 630 and 630(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23 and 57; Securities and Exchange

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

are 11 plaintiffs in the suit and 12 defendants. The plaintiffs include 9 individuals and 2 private limited companies. They claim to be the shareholders of Herbertsons Ltd., defendant No. 12, holding 4,23,950 equity shares in defendant

Synchron Machine Tools P. Ltd. and Others Vs. U.M. Suresh Rao

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4(3), 165, 169, 210, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 402, 403, 404, 406, 433, 439 and 443(2)

Reported in : [1994]79CompCas868(Kar); ILR1992KAR3329; 1992(4)KarLJ490

K.A. Swami, J.1. This petition is filed under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for the following reliefs : '1. declare that the transfer

National Textile Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 439, 443, 445(3) and 450; Constitution of India - Article 43A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 34; Administrative Law; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25FFF

Reported in : AIR1983SC75; [1983]53CompCas184(SC); (1983)1CompLJ1(SC); (1983)ILLJ45SC; (1983)IIMLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1144; (1983)1SCC228; [1983]1SCR922

up the Company on two grounds set out in Clauses (e) and (f) of Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956. One ground was that the Company is unable to pay its debts and the other was

In Re: Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(11), 7, 39(2), 64, 75, 81, 81(1), 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 153, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 186, 206, 208, 209, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 392, 393, 393(1), 393(2), 394, 394(1), 394A, 395, 397, 398, 425, 428, 429, 582 and 582(5)

Reported in : [1995]84CompCas230(Guj)

Spinning and . (hereinafter referred to as 'MFL' for brevity), the transferor company under section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. * * * * 2. The transferor company, MFL, is proposed to be amalgamated with the

Shankar Sundaram Vs. Amalgamations Ltd., Chennai,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas252(Mad)

on the scope of the expression 'affairs of the company' occurring in sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and further questions whether the said expression would include the affairs of the subsidiaries of the

Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck @ Jer Jawahar Thadani and Another Vs. Gharda Ch ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

pleadings and documents filed by the parties are as under. This appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 is directed against an order dated 13th August 2012 passed by the Company Law Board, Mumbai

Vikrant Forge Limited and Others Vs. official Liquidator and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

The applicants question the extent of the authority available to a company Judge under Section 535 of the Companies Act, 1956 and cite the constitutional provisions pertaining to distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the