Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: companies · Page 1 of about 188,233 results (0.053 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 1974

Baldevdas R. Raheja Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-1974

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR581

purchasing shares in the open market as well as through the Life Insurance Corporation on behalf of the companies held or controlled by them or through their own relations, nominees, agents or brokers. The shareholding in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1994

In Re: Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-14-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(11), 7, 39(2), 64, 75, 81, 81(1), 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 153, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 186, 206, 208, 209, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 392, 393, 393(1), 393(2), 394, 394(1), 394A, 395, 397, 398, 425, 428, 429, 582 and 582(5)

Reported in : [1995]84CompCas230(Guj)

Spinning and . (hereinafter referred to as 'MFL' for brevity), the transferor company under section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. * * * * 2. The transferor company, MFL, is proposed to be amalgamated with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2012

Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck @ Jer Jawahar Thadani and Another Vs. Gharda Ch ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-2012

Subject : Company

pleadings and documents filed by the parties are as under. This appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 is directed against an order dated 13th August 2012 passed by the Company Law Board, Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 27 2015

Vikrant Forge Limited and Others Vs. official Liquidator and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-27-2015

Subject : Company

The applicants question the extent of the authority available to a company Judge under Section 535 of the Companies Act, 1956 and cite the constitutional provisions pertaining to distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1995

Tracstar Investments Limited and Vs. Gordon Woodroffe Limited and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Nov-08-1995

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1996)87CompCas941

order, we are dealing with a petition in the form of an application under Section 111(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), filed by Tracstar Investment Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1998

Smt. S. Anuratha Vs. A.K.M.N. Cylinders Private Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Jun-16-1998

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1999)95CompCas555

and C. P. No. 30/111/SRB/97 by Shri S. Balavenkatesan, and Shri S. Man-ickaraj--filed under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") seeking rectification of the register of members of A. K.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 1997

In Re: Hoffland Finance Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : May-12-1997

Subject : Company

1. Hoffland Finance Limited has filed an application for compounding, duly forwarded by the Registrar of Companies, National Capital Territory of Delhi and Haryana under Section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1998

Canara Bank Vs. Ankit Granites Limited

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Nov-20-1998

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1999)97CompCas511

1. This is a petition originally filed under Section 111(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and subsequently considered under Section 111A on an application made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2000

Ashok V. Doshi Vs. Doshi Time Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Apr-03-2000

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2001)104CompCas306

Industries Private Limited (hereinafter called "the company") has filed this petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), alleging various acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1999

M.M.T.C. Limited Vs. Indo-french Bio-tech Enterprise

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Sep-21-1999

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2000)99CompCas112

1. In this petition filed under Section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"), on October 27, 1997, by the petitioner holding 14.79 per cent, of shares in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial