Advanced Search Results

Blue Blends (India) Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(89)LC46Tri(Mum.)bai

validity of the licence which has already been cancelled. The facts in that case were that East India Commercial Company, the appellant had applied for, and been granted, a licence to import fluorescent tubes and fixtures. The application … else in the judgement any support for the proposition put forth by the departmental representative.Kanta International v. CC Commercial Company v. Collector and Fedco Pvt. Ltd. v. S.N. Bilgrani i.e., whether import of goods claimed under a licence

South India Exports Rep. by Its Partner Mr. Indermal Ramani Vs. the Jo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Reguation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 11(1) and 11(2); Indian Customs Act - Sections 108; Sea Customs Act - Sections 167; Foreign Trade (Development and Reguation) Rules

Reported in : 2004(91)ECC555; (2004)1MLJ489

urged that it was a settled law by the celebrated decision of the Supreme Court in East India Commercial Company case : 1983(13)ELT1342(SC) , which was followed later on right up to the case of UNION OF INDIVA … tried to be urged that this is the law laid down by the Supreme Court in East India Commercial Company case, cited supra, which has been followed in UNION OF INDIA v. SAMPAT RAJ DUGAR : 1992(58)ELT163(SC) and

POL India Projects Limited and Another Vs. Aurelia Reederei Eugen Frie ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

initio. The provisions of Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are applicable to the international commercial arbitration held outside India which mandates that arbitration agreement must be by both parties and submits that since … order M/s.POL India Projects Limited are described as the petitioners and Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft and Company KG, is described as the respondents. 2. In so far as Arbitration Petition No.12 of 2012 is concerned,

Baba Associates Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 22(4), (6), 22A, 22A(1), 22A(2), 23 and 25A; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 55

Reported in : ILR1994KAR28

petitioner relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of McDowell & Company Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer : [1977]1SCR914 . The Tribunal following the said judgment, allowed the appeal directing the assessing authority

D.E. Kasisah Vs. N.T. Engineer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR1965Mad257

equipment required from the said international Talkie Equipment Co., by entering into a hire purchase agreement with the Commercial Credit Corporation. The plaintiff did not fare well in the business and he was also in arrears to … the allegations made against him and stated that he was only a sales manager of the 2nd defendant company and when the plaintiff purchased the equipment, he (first defendant) in his capacity as engineer of the company

R.K. Industries Vs. Collector of Customs and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(24)LC407Tri(Delhi)

we are aware of the decision rendered by the Hon'Ue Supreme Court in the case of East India Commercial Company v. Collector of Customs, 1983 AIR 1962 SC1893 wherein while interpreting Section 3(2) of the Imports and Exports … the Customs Authorities had no jurisdiction to confiscate the goods so imported. The said case of East India Commercial Company was distinguished by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Abdul Aziz v. State of Maharashtra, AIR

Seksaria Riswan Sugar Factory Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 24(1); Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43 and 43(5)

Reported in : (1979)11CTR(Bom)274; [1980]121ITR196(Bom); [1979]2TAXMAN65(Bom)

the changing circumstances. The assessee submitted, therefore, that the transactions ought to be viewed in the light of commercial principles, the circumstances prevailing at the relevant time, the intentions in entering into such transactions and the trade … of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922. The assessee before us was at the relevant time a public limited company owning and working a sugar factory and we are concerned with the assessment year 1953-54. The assessee-company had

Sudhir Kumar Ratneswar Saha Vs. Additional Commissioner of Commercial ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1967]20STC9(Cal)

authorities, it is the order of the higher authority which is the operative order. In the East India Commercial Company case (1963) 1 S.C.A. 348, the order was passed by the Collector of Customs, Calcutta, and an appeal … whether any writ could be issued against the authority which passed the original order. In the East India Commercial Company case (1963) 1 S.C.A. 348, it was held that the appellate order was the operative order after the

Smt. K.N.Mahadevi vs Sri. Sagay Raj

Court : Karnataka

R/AT # LAKE C.B.LAYOUT, THAMBU CHETTY PALYA, VIRGO NAGAR (P) BANGALORE -49.2. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., SUDHA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OPP:COFFEE CAFE DAY, RAJAJI NAGAR ENTERANCE, BANGALORE-10.3. S P NISAR AHMED S/O PYARO SAAB, AGED ABOUT 42 … SAAB, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ZAM ZAM ENTERPRISES, NEAR CLOCK TOWER, KOLAR-563 101. -3-4. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP.BY ITS THE BRANCH MANAGER, OFF AT:BAGALUR MANSION, 2ND FLOOR,DODDA PET, KOLAR-563 101. …RESPONDENTS(BY SRI. B V

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-iii Vs. Sercon Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 104

Reported in : [1978]114ITR913(Guj)

be included in the accumulated past profits since it was merely a capital accretion and was not the commercial profits of the company. The Commissioner of Income-tax, therefore, sought this reference on the following three questions to