Advanced Search Results

Mutallib Vs Sunil Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil Procedure Code (CPC)

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 10

process of law. In those proceedings, respondent filed an application under Order 39 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short as Code).4. Vide impugned order, trial court held that the rate of rent of premises is … without due process of law. In those proceedings, respondent filed an application under Order 39 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short as Code).4. Vide impugned order, trial court held that the rate of rent

Nilam Katara Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the Criminal Procedure Code, it has also been used in Rule 2(1) of Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in the context of expenses of witnesses to be paid into court or applying for summons. This … civil proceedings are concerned, the legislature and judicial precedents have provided for recovery of costs of proceedings. The CPC confers discretion on the court to determine by whom, out of which property and to what extent costs

State Vs. Vikas Yadav and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the Criminal Procedure Code, it has also been used in Rule 2(1) of Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in the context of expenses of witnesses to be paid into court or applying for summons. This … civil proceedings are concerned, the legislature and judicial precedents have provided for recovery of costs of proceedings. The CPC confers discretion on the court to determine by whom, out of which property and to what extent costs

Sukhdev Yadav Vs. State and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the Criminal Procedure Code, it has also been used in Rule 2(1) of Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in the context of expenses of witnesses to be paid into court or applying for summons. This … civil proceedings are concerned, the legislature and judicial precedents have provided for recovery of costs of proceedings. The CPC confers discretion on the court to determine by whom, out of which property and to what extent costs

Vishal Yadav Vs. State Govt. of Up

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the Criminal Procedure Code, it has also been used in Rule 2(1) of Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in the context of expenses of witnesses to be paid into court or applying for summons. This … civil proceedings are concerned, the legislature and judicial precedents have provided for recovery of costs of proceedings. The CPC confers discretion on the court to determine by whom, out of which property and to what extent costs

State Vs. Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the Criminal Procedure Code, it has also been used in Rule 2(1) of Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in the context of expenses of witnesses to be paid into court or applying for summons. This … civil proceedings are concerned, the legislature and judicial precedents have provided for recovery of costs of proceedings. The CPC confers discretion on the court to determine by whom, out of which property and to what extent costs

Vikas Yadav Vs. State of Up

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the Criminal Procedure Code, it has also been used in Rule 2(1) of Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in the context of expenses of witnesses to be paid into court or applying for summons. This … civil proceedings are concerned, the legislature and judicial precedents have provided for recovery of costs of proceedings. The CPC confers discretion on the court to determine by whom, out of which property and to what extent costs

United States Vs. Bestfoods

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

§ 107(a)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) against, among others, respondent CPC International Inc., the parent corporation of the defunct Ott Chemical Co. (Ott II), for the costs of cleaning … Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) against, among others, respondent CPC International Inc., the parent corporation of the defunct Ott Chemical Co. (Ott … the subsidiary's performance, supervision of the subsidiary's finance and capital budget decisions, and articulation of general policies and procedures, should not give rise to direct liability." Oswald 282. The critical question is whether, in degree and detail,

Santosh Singh and ors. Vs. Ram Chandra Sah and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Evivtion Control) Act, 1982 - Sections 13, 14(4), 14(7), 14(8) and 14(9); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 13

inherent power of a Court is in addition to and complementary to the powers expressly conferred under the Civil Procedure Code. But that power will not be exercised if or exercise is inconsistent with, or comes into conflict with, … 1987 by which he has rejected the application of the petitioners under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as the Code) for setting aside the ex parte decree

Reboti Ray Vs. Sashi Kanta Budhia @ Agarwal

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2, 10, 75, 94, 94(1), 94(C), 107(2), 141 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 9, Rules 1, 2 and 9 - Order 37, Rule 4 and Order 38; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Arbitration Act

civil courts generally have inherent jurisdiction in cases not covered by Rules 1 and 2 of Order 39, Civil Procedure Code to issue temporary injunctions restraining parties to the proceedings before them from doing certain acts. The powers of … AIR1962SC527 , it has been held that the effect of the expression 'if so prescribed' in Section 94 CPC is to prescribe the circumstances in which courts can exercise or grant a particular relief and ordinarily the