Advanced Search Results
M/S Parth Infrapromotor Llp Vs. M/S Maverick Property Investments pvt. ...
Karnataka
Jan-17-2020
Land Acquisition
KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.381/2019 C/W CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.342/2019 IN CMP No.381/2019BETWEEN : M/S PARTH INFRAPROMOTOR LLP CABIN NO.116, FIRST … THE17H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.381/2019 C/W CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.342/2019 IN CMP No.381/2019BETWEEN : M/S PARTH INFRAPROMOTOR LLP CABIN NO.116, FIRST FLOOR, CHURCHGATE CHAMBERS, PLOT NO.5,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhagirath and Bros. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-21-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 3, Rules 4(1) and 6(2) - Order 9, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 48, Rule 1(1)
[1997]225ITR483(MP)
counsel due to his having gone out of country at the relevant dates of dismissal of the miscellaneous civil cases, supported by identical affidavit of counsel whose instrument of appointment as pleader was not placed on record
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Zeenath
Karnataka
Sep-18-2025
ACT AGAINST THEJUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31-12-2019 PASSED IN MVCNO.1206/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 1,80,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE … SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5135 OF 2022 (MV-D) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2022 (MV-D), MISCELLANEOUS FIRST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Omec Engineers Through One of Its Partner Shri Uday Prakash Singh Vs. ...
Jharkhand
Oct-18-2016
Land Acquisition
the parties. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.8.2015 passed in C.M.P. No.373 of 2014, the opposite party of Civil Miscellaneous Petition (CMP) has preferred this Letters Patent Appeal. The appellant herein entered into two separate agreements with Jharkhand … year of passing the said order, the respondent in the said writ application, Jharkhand State Electricity Board filed Civil Miscellaneous Petition (C.M.P) bearing C.M.P.No.373 of 2014 praying therein to modify the order dated 23.7.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No.4482
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.A. Narayana Raja Vs. Renganayaki Achi (Died) and ors.
Chennai
Apr-28-1983
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 90 and 98 - Order 34, Rule 5
AIR1984Mad27
was actually held on 23-1-1968 and item I was sold in favour, of the 5th respondent in the civil miscellaneous appeal for a sum of Rs. 40,000 and item 2 was Sold in the name of the 6th … sum of Rs. 40,000 and item 2 was Sold in the name of the 6th respondent in the civil miscellaneous appeal, for a sum of Rs. 73,500. On 10-3-1969. the defendant, the judgment debtor field E. A. 157
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe state of Tamil Nadu Vs M PALANISAMY
Chennai
Feb-13-2026
the Respondents in the Writ Petition, have preferred in WA.SR.No.50143 of 2025, on 27.04.2023, along with the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition to condone the delay of 2143 days, in filing the above WA.SR.No.50143 of 2025.4. This Court heard … Appeal, in the interest of justice.6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Respondent submits thatthis Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, is, prima facie, not legally maintainable and that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.Balasivasankar vs the Secretary to Government
Chennai
Feb-10-2026
which was returned by the Registry on 24.03.2023, granting 10 days time for certain compliance. Thereafter, the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 847 days, in representing the above WA.SR.No.38456 of 2023.4. … justice.6. On the other hand, the learned Special Government Pleader for theRespondents 1 and 3 submits that this Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of the Rules of the High Court, Madras, Appellate Side, 1965,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Sorial Muthu vs the Secretary to Government
Chennai
Feb-10-2026
2023, on 27.04.2023, which was returned on 02.05.2023, granting 10 days time for certain compliance. Thereafter, the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 842 days, in representing the above WA.SR.No.60832 of 2023.4. … interest of justice.6. On the other hand, the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondents submits that this Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed underOrder IV Rule 9(4) of the Rules of the High Court, Madras, AppellateSide, 1965, is, prima
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamal Kishore and Co., Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-24-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 133A, 253 and 253(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 2
[1998]232ITR668(MP)
A.R. Tiwari, J.1. These miscellaneous civil cases are heard as connected matters and are being disposed of by this common order.Miscellaneous Civil Case No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelangana Power Generation Corporation Ltd (tsgenco) Vs. Andhra Prades ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-07-2020
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO(S). 1270/2020 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11435/2018 TELANGANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD. (TSGENCO) ...APPELLANT(S)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »