Advanced Search Results

Tvl. Chief Manager Indian Bank Kilpauk Branch, Chennai Vs. The Commiss ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 22.12.2009, in Ref.Z.O.V.R.D.C.No.R1/3645/2009 in respect of the petitioner's property bearing NO.103, New Avadi Road,Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010, Municipal Division No.70 Zone V issued by the second respondent, … for the petitioner and Dr.C.Ravichandran, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is the Indian Bank, Kilpauk Branch, Chennai, represented by its Chief Manager and they have filed this Writ Petition, challenging the communication

Ramesh C.R vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

said property, but they insisted for permission from the fifth respondent, despite the fact that the draft data bank has not been prepared in the locality. On a misconception of facts and law, as directed by the

M/s Paramount Constructions Company Vs. The Authorized Officer & C ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

seeks a mandamus for refund of a sum of `30,69,08,217 paid by the petitioner towards purchase of schedule property along with interest and expenses incurred by it.2. Heard Sri Venkatesh P.Dalwai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, … ... PETITIONER (BY SRI VENKATESH P.DALWAI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER & CHIEF MANAGER, THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, LARGE CORPORATE BRANCH, CENTENARY BUILDING, NO.28, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 058. 2 . THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, LARGE

Malpani Marbles and Granites Pvt. Vs. Allahabad Bank

Court : DRAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : I(2004)BC49

than at the concessional rate. In this connection the learned Counsel for the appellants also relies upon Tannan's Banking Law and Practice in India (19th Edition-1997), especially to Chapter XIII (page 487), wherein it has been mentioned … 3 to 11 whose liability was limited to the extent of the money realised by the sale of Property No. 10, Film Colony, S.M.S Highway, Jaipur as co-owners and legal heirs of the 2nd defendant.3. The respondent/plaintiff-Bank

Sandhya Ravindran vs Revenue Divisional Officer, Thrissur

Court : Kerala

2023 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2023JUDGMENTPetitioner’s property was not initially included in the data bank but remained as “nilam” in the basic tax register. Therefore petitioner filed a Form-6 application and even remitted

Ratheesh T.M., vs the Agricultural Officer,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

purchased the saidproperty after being convinced of the fact that the property was not included in the Data Bank. After the purchase of the said property, the petitioner applied for a building permit for constructing a residential

Priji S vs the District Collector

Court : Kerala

the competent authority to take a decision on the petitioner's request for deletion of the entry regarding her property from the data bank. Accordingly, the application was considered and Ext.P2 decision taken by the Local Level Monitoring … refused to grant permission on the premise that the petitioner's land is included as 'nilam' in the data bank. This led to a prolonged litigation, which culminated with a direction to the competent authority to take a

Ajith.C, vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Court : Kerala

property he has verified all the documents and the property is shown to be excluded from the data bank as is evident from Ext P2 communication issued by the 2nd respondent Agricultural Officer. When the petitioner approached

Joemon P Enjody vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to as Paddy land Act).2. The prosecution case is as follows; The petitioner is the owner of the property having an extentof 1.21 Ares in Re-Survey No.3/9 of Chittoor Village, Palakkad. It is alleged that, the aforesaid … Re-Survey No.3/9 of Chittoor Village, Palakkad. It is alleged that, the aforesaid land was included in the Data Bank as 'paddy land'. The allegation against the petitioner is that, the petitioner had reclaimed the paddy land and

Veazie Bank Vs. Fenno

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Act of July 13, 1866, amendatory of prior internal revenue acts and which provides that every national banking association, state bank, or state banking association shall pay a tax of ten percentum on the amounts of … from this necessity and confer upon it ample power to provide revenue by the taxation of persons and property. And nothing is clearer from the discussions in the Convention and the discussions which preceded final ratification by