Advanced Search Results

Rastriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. a Government of India Undertaking Through It ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationService Tax

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65 and 65(6); Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 88; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2 and 66(3)

Reported in : 2008[11]STR453; [2008]14STT328

the Original Respondents against the impugned Judgment dated 4th July, 2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in Arbitration Petition No. 364 of 2004 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act-1996 (for short, 'The Act') … quashed and set aside.2. The Appellants' case is as under:3. The Respondent is a transport Contractor/ travelling agent/ service provider, governed by the provisions of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961. 4. On 17/06/1993, the Respondent entered into

Walker Vs. Southern Railway Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

provided in a collective bargaining agreement subject to the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, and culminating in binding arbitration might be sidestepped in favor of a lawsuit, in light of the federal policy reflected in the LMRA … [by the Board] on their claim;" for example, "the First Division [which has jurisdiction over disputes involving yard service employees of petitioner's class] . . . has never been current in its work, [and has] a backlog

Givo Ltd. Vs. David Johnson

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationService

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F; Arbitration Act

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT226; (2009)IVLLJ748Del

an award under the Industrial Disputes Act, cannot be said to apply to an award made under the Arbitration Act. As, however, the appeal must be dismissed for the reason that the award contains an error on … per month.3. The petitioner's case is that he was illegally suspended w.e.f. 18.12.96, and then illegally dismissed from service w.e.f. 31.8.98 and that he was not paid his salary from December 1996 onwards, despite repeated demands.4. The

Marriott International Inc. and Others Vs. Ansal Hotels Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(2) (3) (4) and 9; Malaysian Arbitration Act, 1952 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 141and 151; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1) and 41

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)340; AIR2000Delhi377; 82(1999)DLT137

the terms of TSA dated 8.3.1997. 4. The petitioners have moved this Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for interim measure/relief. The main submission of the petitioners is that there is no … contravention with the respondents' agreement with the petitioners. Consequently, respondent No. 1 be retrained from terminating the Technical Services Agreement, Hotel Operating Agreement, Advisory Services Agreement, License and Royalty Agreement, Pre-Opening Technical Assistance Agreement & International Sales

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

3 C. THE FINDINGS IN N.N. GLOBAL IN REGARD TO THE QUESTION UNDER THE CAPTION ‘VALIDITY OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN AN UNSTAMPED AGREEMENT’................................................... 5 D. SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES ....................................................................................................... 15 E. ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 29 F. … is not enforceable in law. It is another matter that the parties may act upon it. Goods or services may change hands, for instance, under a document, which may be otherwise exigible to stamp duty. What is,

Reliance Broadcast Network Limited Vs. Broadcast Engineering and Consu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This batch of petitions have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, in short), inter alia, claiming a common interim measure in the nature of … details of which shall be given in the judgment later.4. The PMA was primarily to provide project management services, to build, install, commission and completion of the common transmission infrastructure. The PMA contemplated payment of fee to

Reliance Broadcast Network Limited Vs. Broadcast Engineering and Consu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This batch of petitions have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, in short), inter alia, claiming a common interim measure in the nature of … details of which shall be given in the judgment later.4. The PMA was primarily to provide project management services, to build, install, commission and completion of the common transmission infrastructure. The PMA contemplated payment of fee to

Vijaya Bank Vs. Maker Development Services Pvt. Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 28(1), 34, 34(2), 34(3), 34(4), 34(5), 35 and 37(1); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 30, 33 and 39; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Contract Act - Sections 55; U.N.C.I.T.R.A.L. Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985; U.N.C.I.T.R.A.L. Conciliation Rules, 1980; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11), 15A and 28; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR143; 2001(3)BomCR652

B. B. Srikrishna. J. 1. This appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') challenges the order of the learned Single Judge, … second term of five years. 3. Under a Supplemental agreement dated 23.5.1988 the Respondent agreed to provide certain services to the Appellant. Under the agreement of 27.6.1989 an area of 2195 sq. ft, was given on leave

Dresser Rand S.A. Vs. Bindal Agro Chem Ltd. and K.G. Khosla Compressor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3;;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33 and 34;;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006SC871; 2006(1)ARBLR171(SC); [2006]131CompCas805(SC); 126(2006)DLT437(SC); JT2006(1)SC262; 2006(1)SCALE218; (2006)1SCC751

BINDAL has filed Suit Nos. 1363/1993 in the Delhi High Court, for a declaration that there exists no arbitration agreement between itself and DR and for a consequential injunction restraining DR from proceeding with the arbitration before … and assignees. No change 1.7 SUPPLIER or VENDOR shall mean the individual or firm supplying the GOODS and SERVICES under this PURCHASE ORDER. No change 27.0 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES/ ARBITRATION 27.1 The OWNER and the SUPPLIER shall

A.K. Bose Vs. Shaw Wallace and Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1993(1)ARBLR103(Delhi); 48(1992)DLT376; 1992(23)DRJ308; 1993LabIC31

Anil Dev Singh, J.(1) This is defendant's application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act (for short 'the Act') seeking stay of the suit. The relevant facts which are necessary for the … from Rs. 5500.00 to Rs. 6000.00 per month. But before the plaintiff could complete the extended term. his services were terminated by the defendant company on December 23, 1987 in purported exercise of its power under clause