Advanced Search Results

Ngc Network India Pvt Ltd vs.orangefish Entertainment Private Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

rights approached the Additional District Judge, Gurugram (in short 'ADJ') with a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short '1996 Act'). This petition was numbered as: Arb. Case No.54/2017.8. Parallelly, the … regarding the consent of the learned Arbitrator was hanging fire, on 07.08.2018, the respondent advertized on the social media that tickets for the 2018 IBW Event would be available from 15.08.2018. For this purpose, it encouraged the … were not rectified. 5.1 The petitioner issued an interim response to this communication of the respondent and, inter alia, informed the respondent about cessation of

R.K. Associates and Hoteliers Pvt Ltd Vs. Aircel Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

this order, I propose to decide the present petition filed by the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has made his submissions … its desire to advertise its brand by way of commercial slides, voice by making use of the Live Media Screens installed by the service provider in Shatabdi Express trains, more particularly, train No.12011-12 (New Delhi-Kalka Shatabdi Express), … never paid the said invoice amount. The petitioner sent many e-mails and communications but the respondent never paid the amount against the invoice. After the

Subaida Ashraf Vs. District General Manager

Court : Kerala

Subject : ArbitrationMedia and Communication

Acts : Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Act, 1957 - Section 7, 7B and 7B(2); ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 68C and 68D; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT193

is whether Section 7B of the Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Act, 1957 (for short, 'the Act') which provides for arbitration of disputes concerning telegraph line, appliance or apparatus arising between the Telegraph Authority and the person for whose … I do not consider it necessary that she must again be asked to approach the authorities concerned. The communications which I have referred to above can be taken as raising the dispute and requesting the authorities to

V. Narasimha Raju Vs. V. Gurumurthy Raju and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationArbitration

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Article 133; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 120-B, 420, 465, 468 and 477

Reported in : AIR1963SC107; [1963]3SCR687

the dispute between the appellant and others and respondent No. 1 was agreed to be referred to the arbitration of Mr. Murty on the respondent No. 1 agreeing to withdraw his criminal complaint. According, when the criminal … arbitration agreement. This argument cannot be accepted because Mr. Murty himself does not admit that he offered to mediate and parties thereupon accepted his advice. According to Mr. Murty he was not present when the agreement was

Security and Finance (P) Ltd. Vs. Dattaraya Ragav Agge

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34 and 35

Reported in : AIR1970SC720; (1970)72BOMLR415; 1970CriLJ756; (1969)1SCC181; [1969]2SCR668

motor truck was made available to Respondent No. 1 for doing transport business. The hire-purchase agreement contained an arbitration clause for settlement of disputes arising between the parties. It appears that subsequently disputes did arise between the

Mukta Arts Limited Vs. Ankit Films a Proprietorship Firm of Sri Anand ...

Court : Patna

Subject : ArbitrationMedia and Communication

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(4), 2(5), 19, 33, 34, 34(3), 36 and 37; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 4; ;Evidence Act; ;Limitation Act; ;Bihar Motion Pictures Association Arbitration Rules; ;Bihar and Jharkhand Motion Pictures Association Arbitration Rules

present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Company, which was directed by the Arbitrator appointed under Arbitration Rules of Bihar Motion Pictures Association to pay to the opposite party a sum of Rs. Five lacs.2.

b.k Educational Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Parag Gupta and Associates

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Income Tax, Madras, (1956) SCR577 2 Punjab National Bank and Ors. v. Surendra Prasad Sinha AIR1992SC1815 3 Interactive Media and Communication Solution Private Limited v. Go Airlines, 199 (2013) DLT267 11 28.2 Further, non-application of the law on limitation … “5. Definitions.-In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,- xxx xxx xxx (6) “dispute” includes a suit or arbitration proceedings relating to- (a) the existence of the amount of debt; (b) the quality of goods or service;

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Sumathi and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationArbitration

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 142 and 226; Arbitration and Conciliation, Act, 1998 - Sections 7, 34 and 36

Reported in : II(2000)ACC1; JT2000(5)SC526; (2000)3MLJ124(SC); 2000(4)SCALE297; (2000)4SCC543; (2000)2UPLBEC1611; AIR 2000 SC 1503

whether the High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution appoint an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1998 (new Act) to decide the quantum of compensation and then make the award of

M/S Advert Communications Pvt. Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

parties have made a request that as the contract period has expired and parties are ready to adopt arbitration proceedings in accordance with arbitration clause 2.10.2, parties may be referred to arbitration. Counsel for the parties, duly … Krishan Dahiya acknowledges the correctness of statement made by counsel for M/s Advert Communications Private Limited. M/s Explo Media Private Limited, petitioner No.2 has authorised Mr.Sunjjoy Daadhicch son of Mr.Shiv Shankar Daadhicch, Director of M/s Explo Media … AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7427-2013 (O&M) Decided on : 11.07.2014 M/s Advert Communications PVT.LTD.and another ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. and Another Vs. Entertainment ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

1. By these two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Act ), both the petitioners have impugned part of the … by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 12th April 2016 in the case of Eros International Media Limited Vs. Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. in Notice of Motion 886 of 2013 in Suit … issue as to whether licensor had a right to grant licenses for communication to the public of sound recordings which embody the lyrics and/or musical