Advanced Search Results

Ct. A. Ct. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. Ct. A. Ct. Subramanian Chettiar an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ArbitrationFamily

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 21, 25, 23, 30 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 - Order 6, Rule 7 - Order 8, Rule 9 - Order 20, Rule 18 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 32, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 5; International Law; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1953Mad492; (1952)2MLJ524

trial on 6-2-1942. It underwentseveral adjournments and on 2-4-1943 the trial actually commenced. It was then referred to arbitration on 6-4-1943 but that proved abortive and the suit was posted peremptorily for trial on 10-12-1943 and the … defendant 1 and his sons, defendants 2 to 5. The parties belong to Nattukottai Chettiar community and the family is an affluent one having extensive money lending business in Burma. Chidambaram Chettiar the father of the plaintiff

Antyakula Eswara Rao Vs. Gudla Kumaraswamy and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationFamily

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 30, 31(2), 32, 33, 34 and 35; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(15); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 158

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD740; 1999(6)ALT644

judgment.2. OS No. 23 of 1987 (Old No.OS No.7 of 1982) is filed under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act for direction to Defendants No. 1 to 5 (Arbitrators) to produce original Award dated 4-2-1982 into the … 5 to act as arbitrators (hereinafter referred to as arbitrators) for making an equitable partition of the joint family movable and immovable properties, the arbitrators accepted the terms of the agreement and passed an award on 4-2-1982.

Chiranjilal Srilal Goenka (Dead), by Lrs. Vs. Jasjit Singh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationFamily

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 12 and 13; Registration Act - Sections 17(1) and 49

Reported in : 2001(73)ECC13; (2001)1MLJ177(SC); 2000(8)SCALE130; [2000]Supp5SCR313

regard to trust and other institutions but the same may not be finally dealt with by the arbitrator. Arbitration expenses shall be shared equally by the parties correspond ing to the share of interest in the property. … from the date of the adoption and from such date all the ties of the child in the family of his or her birth shall be deemed to be severed and replaced by those created by the

Dr. K.M. Shah Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Gift

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Ahd.)721

assessee was disclosing the said property in the wealth-tax returns, in the individual status as self-occupied property. The arbitration award was passed in respect of sub-plots, whereby this individual property was converted into property belonging to the … Suit No. 5332/1994 decided on 18th July, 1995, I have to further submit when there was dispute among family members regarding the ownership of certain properties including Mohan Nivas and its surrounding land, one of the members

Mohanlal K. Shah (Huf) Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD9(Mum.)

Taraben, widow of Mohanlal K. Shah, expired in the year 1984. In or about 1985, an agreement for family partition among Bachubliai, Dr. Ramesh and R.M.Shah, HUF was entered into but the same was not acted upon.Subsequently, … dispute, the matter was referred to the sole arbitrator, Shri S.K.Desai, retired Judge of Bombay High Court for arbitration.The sole arbitrator gave his award on 24-9-1994, whereby he directed that right, title and interest of all the

Mohanlal K. Shah (Huf) Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)92TTJ(Mum.)360

Taraben, widow of Mohanlal K. Shah, expired in the year 1984. In or about 1985, an agreement for family partition among Bachubhai, Dr. Ramesh and R.M.Shah, HUF was entered into but the same was not acted upon.Subsequently, … the matter was referred to the sole arbitrator, Shri S.K. Desai, retired Judge of Bombay High Court for arbitration.2.5 The sole arbitrator gave his award on 24th Sept., 1994, whereby he directed that right, title and interest

Syed Zakir Ali S/O Jawar Ali Vs. Syed Zahid Ali S/O Jawar Ali

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 15, 16, 17, 30, 35 and 39(1); Evidence Act - Sections 3; Trade Mark Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 123; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR17; 2007(3)ARBLR321(Bom); 2007(4)BomCR500

pending for admission since 2001. 2. This Appeal is under Section 17 read with Section 39(1)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and challenges the judgment and decree dated 11.12.2000 delivered by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gondia, … in present matter need to be viewed differently. He states that in fact the Arbitrators have brought-in a family settlement between rival parties and therefore such awards stand on totally different footing. He places reliance upon various

Narsingh Das Vs. Firm Joint Hindu Family Known as Gogan Ram Lachmi Nar ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1955P& H31

been pending for some time, on 23-10-1950, the plaintiff and Narsing Das filed an application under Section 21, Arbitration Act, to refer the whole of the matters in dispute between them to the arbitration of one Badri … J.1. The facts giving rise to this Letters Patent Appeals are as follows.The present appellant, a joint Hindu family firm named Gogan Ram Lachmi Narain, instituted a suit in the Court of the Senior Subordinate Judge at

C.C. Subbaraya Setty Vs. C.V. Ananthanarayana Setty and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 28, 30 and 38

Reported in : AIR1996Kant41; ILR1995KAR2892; 1996(1)KarLJ35

1. This appeal is filed by respondent-3 in Arbitration Case No. 1 / 73 on the file of the Civil Judge, Hassan, against his order rejecting his … 'the Act') stating that the appellant and respondent-4 and 5 had referred their dispute regarding partition of their family properties to them by means of a deed of submission dated 23-1-1972, that on 24-1-1972 they met the

Kusampudi Subba Raju Vs. Master Penumatsa Sayi Raju and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Guardians and Wards Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 1, Rules 9 and 10(2) - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 23, Rule 1 and 1(2) - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD88; 2005(5)ALT192

the findings recorded by the trial Court and would maintain that having expressed serious doubt about the so-called arbitration award on the strength of which rights are being claimed by the respondents/defendants dismissal of the suit despite … Venkata Satyanarayanaraju as the other group, to Annapurnamma's properties, elders interested in both the groups brought about a family settlement between the two groups and the settlement was reduced to writing as a registered partition deed dated