Advanced Search Results

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Telephone Cables Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 11 and 11(6); ;Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

Reported in : JT2010(3)SC541; (2010)5SCC213; AIR2010SC2678; AIR2010SCW3851; 2010(6)MLJ99; 2010(3)SCJ889

suggesting that the disputes between them (for payment of Rs. 10,61,20,000/- as damages to respondent) be referred to arbitration. BSNL by its reply dated 17.7.2007 rejected the request for arbitration. The respondent therefore filed an application under … group; and the bidders for placement of orders were to be selected from the list of technically and commercially responsive bidders in each group arranged in decreasing order of 'Vendor Rating' starting from the highest. The bidder

Hamburg Bulk Carriers Gmbh Foreign Company Vs. Vishal Exports Overseas ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CommercialArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1) and 20; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1888 - Sections 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 29

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR394(Gujarat); (2005)2GLR954

effect that the trial court is not the Court as defined and understood under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and consequently, the trial court has no … of the acceptance and place of signature, be relevant.8.3 It is required to be noted that in international commercial contracts where one of the parties resides outside India and contracts are often concluded by exchange of fax,

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Meena Steels Limited and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1985All282

appellants before the trial Court for stay of the proceedings in the suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The application was opposed by the respondent 1 and it was rejected on Jan. 24, 1984, with … 34 and. if the conditions (hereof are satisfied, there should be very strong grounds for refusing stay in commercial cases especially vide Ram Bahadur Thakur v. Thakur Das, : AIR1958All522 . It should be borne in mind

Transocean Shipping Agency P. Ltd. Vs. Black Sea Shipping and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : The Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 -- Sections 2 and 7; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Independence (International Arrangements) Order, 1947

Reported in : 1998(1)ARBLR228(SC); [1999]96CompCas367(SC); JT1998(1)SC101; 1998(1)SCALE86; (1998)2SCC281; [1998]1SCR130

is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court dated 9th of October, 1996 in Arbitration Petition No. 22 of 1996 whereby the High Court has allowed the petition and passed a decree, under … means an award of differences between persons arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial under the law in force in India, made on or after the 11th day of October, 1960-(a)...(b) in

Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Ltd. Vs. National Projects Construction ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 85(2000)DLT738; 2000(54)DRJ497; (2000)126PLR5

C. Rama Rao, retired Director General of Works CPWD as Arbitrator under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. 2. The work of 'Pile Design and construction of Piles, Pile caps, etc. for BALCO Captive … jeal- ousy on the jurisdiction of the Arbitrators. The modern tendency is in my opinion more especially in commercial arbitrators, to endeavor to uphold awards of the skilled persons that the par- ties themselves have selected to

Kamal Kumar Vs. Airport Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14 and 17;

Reported in : 75(1998)DLT146; 1998(46)DRJ17

Act which embodies principles derived from a specialised branch of the law of agency (see Mustill & Boyd's Commercial Arbitration, Second Edition, P. 641). He commits misconduct if by his award he decides matters excluded by the … agreement dated February 22, 1994 as a consequence was entered into between the parties. The same contained an arbitration clause 25 which reads as follows:'CLAUSE 25. Except where otherwise provided in the contract all questions and disputes

M/s Jakkur Promoters Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

arises in the matter, then under such circumstances, the same has to be referred 11 - - to Arbitration. Instead of doing so, the proceedings are initiated only with an intention to convert the civil dispute or … of doing so, the proceedings are initiated only with an intention to convert the civil dispute or the commercial dispute into a criminal case and hence it amounts to registration of false and frivolous complaint. It is

Shivaai Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Rites Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR256(Delhi)

A.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioner in this petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Act'), is aggrieved against the action of the respondent No. 2 … from national and international firms/joint ventures/consortium for allotment of about 225 shelters/sites on but basis against display of commercial advertisement thereon, as according to the petitioner it is given the contract for these sites and during the

DIn Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Sh. A.S. Rana

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR458(Delhi); 139(2007)DLT161

the learned Counsel to restrict submissions within the scope of a challenge permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. 11. But, due to insistence by the counsel that it was a case of … Work had to commence on 1.3.1996. It had to be completed within 24 months. 8. Parties ran into commercial disputes. For a long period of time work remained suspended. There was negotiation between the contractor and the

Cox And Kings Ltd. Vs. Sap India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

the 1940 Act. Moreover, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law10 adopted the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration in 1985.11 The General Assembly of the United Nations recommended all the Member States to adopt the … 2023 INSC1051Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition (Civil) No.38 of 2020 Cox and Kings Ltd. …Petitioner Versus SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. …Respondents