Advanced Search Results
Ram Lal Jagan Nath Vs. Punjab State Through Collector and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-04-1966
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2
AIR1966P& H436
having arisen between the parties regarding payment in several cases, the contractors approached the Settlement Committee, Patiala, for arbitration. In the case before us, however, the dispute relates to work-orders No. 1-6/259, dated 21-11-1958, No. 98-100/37, dated … for his decision.It is indisputable that the Courts in this country have jurisdiction to try all suits of civil nature and the present suits are undoubtedly of that nature. But it is competent to a party to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijendra Nath Srivastava (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Mayank Srivastava and ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-10-1994
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 14, 17 and 30; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 119; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 35 - Order 6, Rules 2, 4 and 17; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83(1)
AIR1994SC2562; JT1994(5)SC195; 1994(3)SCALE739; (1994)6SCC117; [1994]Supp2SCR529
divided the immovable as well as movable properties in six shares for each of six parties to the arbitration. By the said award the joint family properties were divided as follows :Party No. 1 Immovable property Rs. … the six branches of the family is liable to be set aside. The award was accepted by the Civil Court (Vth Additional District & Sessions Judge, Lucknow and a direction was given for making it the rule
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRayalaseema Bank Ltd. Vs. Tharigopala Pedda Narayanappa and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-01-1960
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39(1) and 39(2)
AIR1961AP483
39(2) of the Indian Arbitration Act refers to the appeals under Sections 100, 109 and 110 of the Civil Procedure Code, and would not apply to appeals under Clause (10) of the Letters Patent of the Punjab … entered upon the reference and was therefore in contravention of Clause (3) of Schedule (1) of the Indian Arbitration Act. In view of his finding on Issue No. 2 the learned Judge did not find it necessary
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2009
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 29, 30, 33, 39 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34
2009(4)AWC3998(SC); (2009)8MLJ948(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)883; 2009(13)SCALE316; (2009)10SCC187:].2009AIRSCW6521
Appeal No. 1631/2006, whereby and where under the appeal preferred by appellant herein under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter shall be referred to as `the Act') has been dismissed, which arose out of the … dated 15.5.2007 passed by learned Single Judge of High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench in SB Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1631/2006, whereby and where under the appeal preferred by appellant herein under Section 39 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Moti Enterprises
Mumbai
Feb-22-2005
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 16 and 34
2005(2)MhLj791
the orders and judgments of a learned single Judge dismissing the appellants' petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the said Act') for setting aside the award of the learned sole … bad weather; or (iii) by reason of serious loss or damage by fire, or (iv) by reason of civil commotion, local combination ofworkmen, strike or lockout, affecting any of the tradesemployed on the work, or (v) by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Orissa and Orissa Mining Corporation Vs. Klockner and Company ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-1996
CivilArbitration
Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 32 and 34; Government of Orissa (Law Department) promulgated Ordinance, 1991
[1996]87CompCas644a(SC)
clause for the purpose of disposal of these Appeal is clause 15 in the agreement which relates to arbitration. It reads as follows; 15. 1. In the remote and unlikely event of there being any dispute or … ORDERK. Venkataswami, J.1. The above Civil Appeals arise out of an Order passed in Misc. Case No. 426/93 in T.S. 152/93 on the file
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDavuluru Vijaya Ramayya Vs. Davuluru Venkatasubba Rao and ors.
Chennai
Sep-16-1915
CivilArbitration
(1916)30MLJ465
been instituted by the present 1st defendant for partition. That suit was in the First Court referred to arbitration (by orders in November 1906 and March 1907). The award was dated 9th April 1907 and a decree … the consent decree was with leave of the court under 0rder 32, Rule 7 (Section 462 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1882). I shall in the rest of my judgment refer only to the Code of 1908
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijayalakshmi Jayaram Vs. M.R. Parasuram and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-13-1995
CivilCommercialArbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 21, Rule 49 - Order 22, Rules 5 and 10; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 44; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13 and 34; Succession Act, 1925; Companies Act - Sections 433
AIR1995AP351; 1995(2)ALT32
circumstances to account and in the event there being any further dispute the same shall be settled by arbitration.' As per Clause 26, 'with regard to any dispute arising out of this agreement or of the interpretation … appeal has abated long back has to be considered. Under Order, 22 Rule 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the case of death of any party, it is the duty of the counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSinghal and Brothers and anr. Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and o ...
Mumbai
Apr-27-2005
CivilArbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 3(1), 4, 11, 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 16, 21, 30, 43, 43(2), 43(3) and 43(4); ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43 - Schedule - Article 137; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ;Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18 and 30; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1996 - Sections 226
2005(5)BomCR261; 2005(3)MhLj951
this petition is as under : Does the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, have the jurisdiction to dismiss an application for constitution of an arbitral tribunal on … of the arbitral tribunal under Section 16, on the facts of that case, the Court held that the Civil Court could not decide the issue. Even in a matter, if an issue arises, whether notice has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTejpal Jamunadas Vs. B. Nathmull and Co.
Kolkata
Apr-29-1919
ArbitrationCivil
(1919)ILR46Cal1059,54Ind.Cas.668
v. Satish Chunder Dutt (1911) I.L.R. 38 Calc. 522.24. This case, however, depended upon the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code. The case which I have now to consider depends upon the provisions of the Indian Arbitration … purchase of Hessian cloth.4. In pursuance of the terms of the contract, the dispute was referred to the arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce and, on the 14th June, 1918, an award was made in favour
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »