Advanced Search Results
Amarjit Kaur and ors. Vs. Karamvir Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2006
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Punjab (Custom) (Power to Contest) Act, 1920 - Sections 6
AIR2006SC2481; 2006(3)AWC2389(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN51; 2006(4)SCALE553; (2006)11SCC610
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the legality of judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in second appeal filed under Section 100 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P.S.R.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Sarada Prasad Misra and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2006
Labour and IndustrialService
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2006SC2466; 2006(3)AWC2257(SC); [2006(110)FLR622]; JT2006(5)SC114; (2006)IILLJ829SC; 2006(4)SCALE507; (2006)4SCC733; 2006(3)SLJ178(SC); 2006SC353; MANU/SC/8107/2006
C.K. Thakker, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated July 8, 2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4084 of 1985....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaryana State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mamni
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1), 11A and 25F; Evidence Act - Sections 106; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 6N; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 7
AIR2006SC2427; (2006)IILLJ744SC; RLW2006(3)SC2545; 2006(5)SCALE164; (2006)9SCC434; 2007(1)SLJ158(SC)
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The respondent herein was appointed initially for a period of 89 days in the post of Junior Technician (Electronics) on an ad hoc basis on or about 31.10.1990. In terms of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Klassic Construction (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation
Supreme Court of India
May-25-2006
Arbitration
Society Registration Act, 1860
AIR2006SC2430; 2006(2)ARBLR432(SC); JT2006(7)SC231; 2006(6)SCALE325; (2006)9SCC688
1. Heard Mr. P.N. Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewari, learned Counsel for the respondent. The appellant before us is a contractor. The respondent is the Army Welfare Housing Organisation represented...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment of A.P. and anr. Vs. Y. Surender Reddy
Supreme Court of India
May-25-2006
CivilService
Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 19; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2006SC2446; 2006(3)CTC508; [2006(110)FLR628]; 2006(6)SCALE321; (2006)10SCC207
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The above appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 8.8.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Petition No. 14645 of 2000 whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalu Ram and anr. Vs. State of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304 and 307
AIR2006SC2460; 2006CriLJ3284; JT2006(6)SC22; 2006(6)SCALE478; (2006)5SCC674
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants question correctness of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court who dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants simply observing that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMilind Moreshwar Kowley Vs. Manohar Bhaskar Kowley (Dead) by L.Rs. and ...
Supreme Court of India
May-12-2006
Property
Income Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3B
AIR2006SC2454; 2006(6)BomCR203; 102(2006)CLT516(SC); 2006(6)SCALE111; (2006)5SCC691
B.P. Singh, J.1. These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Civil Appeal Nos. 277 of 1994 and 368 of 1994. By...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMayuram Subramanian Srinivasan Vs. C.B.i.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-16-2006
Criminal
Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transaction in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 5(2), 9, 9(4), 10 and 18; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appeal Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 - Sections 2; Probation Act - Sections 18; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 302, 379, 389, 389(1), 389(3) and 439; Constitution of India - Articles 134, 134(1), 134A, 136, 139A, 141, 145, 145(1) and 317
AIR2006SC2449; 102(2006)CLT648(SC); 2006CriLJ3285; JT2006(6)SC1; RLW2006(4)SC3080; 2006(6)SCALE483; (2006)5SCC752; [2006]69SCL105(SC)
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. When the matter was placed for admission, the office report pointed out that the appellant in each Appeal has not surrendered and therefore in terms of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 (in short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Shankar Singhania and ors. Vs. Gaur Hari Singhania and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-04-2006
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20 and 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
AIR2006SC2488; 2006(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2006(3)BomCR10; 2006(2)CTC597; JT2006(4)SC251; (2006)3MLJ243(SC); 2006(4)SCALE74; (2006)4SCC658; 2006(1)LC423(SC)
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. This appeal was directed against the final judgment and order dated 8/9th June, 2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No. 440 of 1996...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCeat Ltd. Vs. Murphy India Employees Union
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2006
ServiceSICA
Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Bombay Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1948 - Sections 38B; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 7, 20(2), 21, 26, 28, 28(1) and 28(4); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 10A(3A), 18(1) and 18(3); Apprentices Act, 1961; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 62
AIR2006SC2412; 2006(4)BomCR682; [2006(110)FLR203]; [2007(1)JCR305(SC)]; (2006)IILLJ891SC; 2006(4)SCALE628; (2006)9SCC478; 2007(1)SLJ29(SC)
ORDERS:11. Applicability of the provisions of the 1948 Act is not in question. The only contention raised is the applicability of the Model Standing Orders. The fact that the company had its Certified Standing Orders is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »