Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Pubs: air1989sc177 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.010 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 1989

Reet Mohinder Singh Sekhon Vs. Mohinder Parkash and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-31-1989

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 30; Limitation Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1989SC1775; JT1989(3)SC379; 1989(2)SCALE268; (1989)4SCC30; [1989]3SCR610; 1989(2)LC600(SC)

S. Ranganathan, J.1. We grant leave in the Special Leave Petition and proceed to dispose of the appeal on the merits after hearing both sides.2. The appellant is the successor-in-interest of the mortgagor of the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1989

Ramesh Chand Vs. Prescribed Authority and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-1989

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 43(2); Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 7F

Reported in : AIR1989SC1778; JT1989(3)SC305; 1989(2)SCALE1450; (1989)3SCC558; [1989]3SCR560; 1989(2)LC521(SC)

M.H. Kania, J.1. This is an Appeal by Special Leave against a judgment and order dated September 15, 1982 delivered by the Allahabad High Court in Civil Miscellaneous Writ No. 14807 of 1981 (reported in 1983...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1988

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Dr. Ashok Kumar Gupta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Ordinance of University of Rajasthan - Ordinance 278E; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1989SC177; JT1988(4)SC176; 1988(2)SCALE909; (1989)1SCC93; [1988]Supp3SCR493; 1989(1)LC295(SC)

ORDERIThe appeals fail and are dismissed.IIOrdinance 278-E(d)(ii) of the Ordinances of the University of Rajasthan is declared as unconstitutional and quashed.IIIAdmissions to the Post Graduate Degree Courses in all the Medical Colleges at all centers in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 20 1989

Government of India Vs. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals, Madras and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-20-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rule 12; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(3) and 19(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1989SC1771; 1989(24)LC440(SC); 1989(42)ELT515(SC); [1990]184ITR467(SC); JT1989(3)SC118; 1989(2)SCALE44; (1989)3SCC483; [1989]3SCR465; 1989(2)LC368(SC)

K.N. Singh, J.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras dt. 2-8-1974, quashing the notices issued by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Madras.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1989

Union of India and ors. Vs. H.N. Kirtania

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-12-1989

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR1989SC1774; (1990)1CALLT38(SC); [1989(59)FLR227]; JT1989(3)SC132; (1989)IILLJ585SC; 1989(2)SCALE26; (1989)3SCC445; [1989]3SCR394; 1989(3)SLJ44(SC)

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta, dated November 30, 1987.3. The respondent was posted as Public Relations Officer in the Regional Passport Office, Calcutta. He was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial