Advanced Search Results
Srinivasagam Pillai Vs. Kuttiah and ors.
Chennai
Nov-18-1987
CivilProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 23
AIR1989Mad18
ORDERK.M. Natarajan, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order of remand passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputtur. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal are briefly stated as follows...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajapalayan Industrial and Commercial Syndicate Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.A. ...
Chennai
Jul-19-1988
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 3; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291 and 403
AIR1989Mad139
ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. This revision petition is against an order passed on 26-5-1-988 by the Vacation Civil Judge in I.A. 697 of 1988. It is, no doubt, an ad interim ex parte order and a revision petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExxon Corporation, 1251 Avenue of the America, New York, U.S.A. Vs. Ex ...
Chennai
Jun-27-1988
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchanise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 120(1)
AIR1989Mad182; (1988)IIMLJ516
Mohan, J.1. All these appeals can be dealt with in a common judgment.2. O.S.A. 17 of 1988 is filed against an order dated 10-4-1987 in Appn. No. 4972 of 1986 in C.S.797 of 1986 on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vythilingam Chettiar Vs. Rangaswami Padayachi
Chennai
Sep-09-1988
Commercial
Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1979 - Sections 31 and 33(1); Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1978 - Sections 1
AIR1989Mad135
Sathiadev, J.1. Defendant in An unregistered suit (S.R. No. 43243 of 1979) on the file of the District Munsif's Court; Vridhachalam, is the petitioner herein. Respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Ct.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Madras and ors. Vs. the Director of Enf ...
Chennai
Mar-09-1988
FERA
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 54; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 12(2), 17, 18-A, 18-B, 23 and 23(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1964
AIR1989Mad141
M.N. Chandurkar, C.J. 1. These five appeals arise out of an order of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, made in five connected appeals which were also filed by the present appellants but were dismissed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPallavan Transport Corporation Ltd. (Metro) Vs. P. Murthy and Etc.
Chennai
Nov-19-1986
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B
AIR1989Mad14
Sengottuvelan, J.1. All the abovesaid four appeals arise out of the Award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madras, in O.P. No. 275 of 1980 and O.P. No. 318 of 1980.2. The facts of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnammal (Died) and anr. Vs. Kannagi and ors.
Chennai
Sep-14-1988
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 61; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 6, Rules 2 and 17 - Order 41, Rule 27; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1)
AIR1989Mad185
Srinivasan, J.1. One Chidambara Udayar of Pottireddipatti, Nainakkal Taluk, Salem District, had three sons Rangasamy Udayar, Ganesan and Devaraju. By a deed dated 11-3-1959, a partition was effected among the father and sons. While the father...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Bank, Madras Vs. Asstt. Commissioner (C.T.), Zone-iii, Madras 1 ...
Chennai
Mar-16-1988
Sales Tax
Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 171 and 172
AIR1989Mad17
ORDERSwamikkannu, J. 1. This petition is for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent, the Assistant Commissioner (Commercial Taxes) Zone III, Madras-1, to forbear from selling the properties of the second respondent herein...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPalanikumar Pillai Vs. Palani Kumar Pillai and ors.
Chennai
Apr-29-1988
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151; Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 2 and 3
AIR1989Mad119; (1988)IMLJ297
Srinivasan, J.1. A score and a year ago, the foundation for the present appeals was laid by the institution of a suit for partition in the court of the Subordinate Judge of Tirunelveli. The 6th defendant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Jagajeevan Ram and Etc. Vs. Govt. of India and ors.
Chennai
Apr-29-1988
Media and CommunicationConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 16(4) and 226; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4(2), 5A, 5B, 5B(1), 7B(1), 7D, 8 and 58(2); Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 - Rules 22(9), 24(1), 24(8), 32(1), 32(2) and 41(5); Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 - Sections 2
AIR1989Mad149
Sathiadev, J. 1. These two writ appeals are preferred against the common judgment of the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan dt. 15-2-1988 rendered in W.P. Not 1166, 1181 and 1229 of 1988. W.A. No. 469 of 1988...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›