Advanced Search Results
indira Jasing Vs. Union of India and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-21-1988
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 19(I)
AIR1989Bom25; 1989(2)BomCR101; 1988MhLJ745
ORDER1. The petitioner is an Advocate and solicitor practising in this High Court and the Supreme Court of India. She edits a monthly magazine called 'The Lawyers' Collective'. She is also the Secretary of an organisation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDamodar Haribaksha Agrawal Vs. Ramratidevi and ors., Etc. Etc.
Mumbai
Nov-15-1988
Tenancy
Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949
AIR1989Bom257; 1989(2)BomCR26; 1989MhLJ425
Dhabe, J.1. These appeals by letters patent can be conveniently disposed of by this common judgment. Briefly the facts are that the appellant landlord filed applications in these cases against the respondents/tenants under several clauses of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Sippy and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-22-1988
Other TaxesConstitution
Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923; Bombay Entertainment Duty (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(A), 3(1A) and 4C; Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1989Bom250; 1988(3)BomCR642; (1988)90BOMLR578; 1989MhLJ165
1. As all these writ petitions involve common questions of law and fact they wee heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The petitioners are proprietors of video game parlous at Bombay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›