Advanced Search Results
S. Padmavathi Amma and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Dec-16-1982
Property
Kerala Land Acquisition Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 6, 42, 43 and 43(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1983Ker88
Bhat, J.1. The common 4th respondent in these original petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, is the Film Line Corporation, a partnership firm with two partners namely, Sivasankaran Nair and his wife. The petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.K. Santhamma Vs. the Kerala Public Service Commission and anr.
Kerala
Oct-05-1982
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(4) and 315; Kerala Public Service Commission Procedure Rules - Rule 22
AIR1983Ker84
ORDERM.P. Menon, J.1. The petitioner was one of the applicants for selection to the post of staff Nurse, and was ranked as number 467 in the ranked list brought into force by the Public Service Commission,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPuthanpurayil Pullotichi Mariyam Vs. Valia Peedikavil Tharamballi Moos ...
Kerala
Jan-04-1983
Property
Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1976 - Sections 6C
AIR1983Ker87
P.C. Balakrishna Menon, J.1. The first defendant is the appellant. The suit is for recovery of possession of an item of property on the strength of the plaintiffs' title. The plaintiffs are the karnavan and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Krishna Pillai Vs. Pazhuckamattom Devaswom and ors.
Kerala
Mar-08-1982
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 23, Rule 1
AIR1983Ker8
ORDERSukumaran, J. 1. This unfortunate litigationcentres round a temple and a trust.The suit itself was filed forsettling a scheme for the managementand administration of PazhukkamattonDevaswom near Chelamattomkara inPerumbavoor which is claimed to be apublic trust. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAchuthan Pillai Vs. Marikar (Motors) Ltd., Trivandrum and ors.
Kerala
Nov-17-1982
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 61, 62 and 101 to 104
AIR1983Ker81
Balakrishna Menon, J. 1. The 2nd defendant is the appellant. The suit is for recovery of Rs. 25,090.05 said to be due to the plaintiff from the defendants under a hire purchase agreement in respect of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›