Advanced Search Results
Leela Dhundiraj Divekar Vs. E.C. Shinde and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-23-1968
PropertyCivil
Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Sections 8 and 9; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 72, 77 and 78; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 15; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 8; Registration Act, 1877 - Sections 77; Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 6 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417 and 417(3); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 and 29(2); Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 55
AIR1970Bom109; (1969)71BOMLR305; 1969MhLJ487
1. This is a suit filed by one of the executants of a document under Section 77 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908, for a decree directing the Defendants, who are the appropriate registering authorities, to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithalbhai T. Patel Vs. Shyamlal Durgadas Khanna
Mumbai
Nov-19-1968
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148 - Order 37, Rules 3(4) and 4; Bombay City Civil Court Rules, 1948 - Rule 123; Limitation Act - Sections 5
AIR1970Bom101; (1969)71BOMLR372; 1969MhLJ732
1. This is a revisional application on behalf of the original plaintiff from the order dated October 28, 1966, made on the Chamber summons dated October 17, 1966, whereby the City Civil Court directed that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Jayaram and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Jan-14-1969
Service
States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 9, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, and 86; Constitution of India - Article 226; Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1963; Pension Rules
AIR1970Bom117; (1970)72BOMLR258; ILR1971Bom150
Padhye, J.1. Original petitioners in this petition were two (1) Shankar Jayaram Ambedkar in his individual capacity and (2) Nagpur District Pensioners' Association, Nagpur, through its Honorary Secretary Mr. R. N. Gadre. After the petition was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jagpalsingh Sajjansingh Vs. Digamber Tulsiram and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-13-1968
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 38, 38(7), 107, 107(2), 111, 111(1), 111(2) and 114; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Bombay Revenue Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(4), 9(5), 9(7), 11, 11(6), 13, 25, 45 and 47(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 12; Bombay Revenue Tribunals Act
AIR1970Bom122; (1969)71BOMLR545; ILR1970Bom592; 1969MhLJ347
ORDER1. The petitioner, who is the landholder, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, challenging an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal holding that his revision application against the order of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhudas Kalyanji Adhia Vs. State
Mumbai
Apr-09-1969
Criminal
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3 , 18 and 27
AIR1970Bom134; (1969)71BOMLR470; 1970CriLJ455
1. The only question which arises in this appeal filed by Prabhudas Kalyanji Adhia against his conviction under Section 18(c) read with Section 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, for manufacturing, stocking and selling...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDadarao Son of Kashiram and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. Overruled
Mumbai
Jul-24-1969
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 10(3), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(2), 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(4), 45(2), 46, 46(3) and 53; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahal, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950; Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 5; Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(4), 24B and 27; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahal, Alienated Lands) (Amendment) Act, 1951
AIR1970Bom144; (1970)72BOMLR246; ILR1970Bom540; 1969MhLJ813
Padhye, J. 1. The facts in the two cases slightly differ, but that does not make any difference in the legal position to be considered in these two cases and hence both these special civil applications...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGitabai Vs. Dayaram Shankar and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-04-1968
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 111 and 115 - Order 13, Rule 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 18, 91 and 92; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 6, 7 and 120; Constitution of India - Ariticles 226 and 227; Berar Regulation of Agricultural Leases Act
AIR1970Bom160; (1970)72BOMLR32; ILR1970Bom572; 1969MhLJ838
ORDER1. This is a landlord's petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. Dayaram, respondent No. 1, filed an application on 21-5-1963 before the Agricultural Lands Tribunal requesting that he should bedeclared a tenure-holder and purchaser of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchand Maroti Mandwale Vs. Malkapur Municipal Council, Malkapur and ...
Mumbai
Feb-19-1969
Constitution
Constitution of India - Ariticles 45, 226, 227, 246, 265 and 276(2); Maharashtra Education (Cess) Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 4, 5(1), 6, 9(1), 9(2) and 9(3); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965
AIR1970Bom154; (1970)72BOMLR240; ILR1971Bom165; 1969MhLJ540
Padhye, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to challenge the demand notice dated 21st January 1967 as being illegal and prays for a writ of prohibition to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdishprasad Kashiprasad and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and an ...
Mumbai
Feb-26-1969
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 147, 149 and 367; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325
AIR1970Bom166; (1969)71BOMLR536; 1970CriLJ660; ILR1969Bom1191; 1969MhLJ433
1. This is an appeal filed by four of the original seven accused persons against their conviction by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Khamgaon, which was confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, on appeal. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWaman Suryabhan and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur and ...
Mumbai
Sep-09-1968
TenancyLimitation
Tenancy Law; Bombay Vidarbha Region Agricultural Tenants (Protection from Eviction and Amendment of Tenancy Laws) Act, 1958 - Sections 5(1), 36 and 36(2); Berar Regulation of Agriculatural Leases Act, 1951 - Sections 8(1), 9(1) and 9(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 111, 112 and 113; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Vidarbha Region Agricultural Tenants (Protection from Eviction and Amendment of Tenancy Laws) Ordinance, 1957 - Sections 3 and 4; Bombay Vidarbha Region Agricultural Tenants (Protection from Eviction and Amendment of Tenancy Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4 and 5
AIR1970Bom167; (1969)71BOMLR553; ILR1970Bom438; 1969MhLJ375
1. This is a tenants' petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal holding that the respondents Nos, 3 and 4 were entitled to restoration of possession of two...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »