Advanced Search Results
Swamiappa Mudaliar Vs. K.R. Ponnammal and anr.
Chennai
Mar-24-1958
CriminalTenancy
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439, 476 and 476B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115
AIR1959Mad107; 1959CriLJ482; (1958)2MLJ182
ORDERSomasundaram, J. 1. This is a revision against an order of the Rent Controller refusing to file a complaint under Section 476 Crl. P. C. in respect of a receipt filed before his court. In the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New Central Hall, a Firm of Two Partners, Ismail Ibrahim Sully and ...
Chennai
Aug-18-1958
Commercial
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 31
AIR1959Mad153; (1959)1MLJ28
1.This is an appeal by the New Central Hall, a firm consisting of two partners, Ismail Ibrahim Sully and Moose Ibrahira Sully, plaintiffs in O. S. No. 40 of 1952 on the file of the Subordinate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.L.M. Muthiah Chettiar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madra ...
Chennai
Aug-19-1958
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 10 and 10(2)
AIR1959Mad158; [1958]33ITR567(Mad); (1959)2MLJ196
1. Certain facts and circumstances are common to all these cases and we shall set them out first.2. Between February 1942 and September 1945 Malava was under the occupation of the Japanese. During this period the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Govindaraju and anr. Vs. Lala
Chennai
Aug-05-1958
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 41, Rule 19(1); ;Madras Appellate Side Rules - Rule 41B
AIR1959Mad183; (1958)IIMLJ515
ORDERRamaswami, J. 1. The point lor determination is whether a civil revision petition which has been dismissed for default of appearance can be restored. So far as this High Court is concerned there are two lines...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC. Solomon Vs. Josephine
Chennai
Sep-08-1958
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 18 and 19
AIR1959Mad151
1. The petitioner is the husband. He was married to the respondent in accordance with Christain rites on 18-6-1951 at Mayuram. On 2-1-1957 the husband filed a petition under Section 18 of the Indian Divorce Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Muthukarunga Konar and anr.
Chennai
Oct-08-1958
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 1 and 164
AIR1959Mad175; 1959CriLJ603
Ramaswami, J.1. These are two connected appeals preferred attains t the convictions and sentence's by the learned Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram in Sessions Case No. 143/1957.2. P.W. 3 Mandakalai alias Periakaruppa Konar obtained a decree against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Arunachala Naicker Vs. Ghulam Mahmood Sahib
Chennai
Aug-21-1958
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 4, 6 to 8, 9 and 9(3); Madras City Tenants Protection (Amendment) Act, 1955; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 47, 96 and 115
AIR1959Mad191; (1959)1MLJ181
1. This Civil revision petition arises at the instance of the tenant against whom a decree has been passed in a suit for eviction. In 1917 the respondent granted a lease of a property, a land,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.S. Thiruvengadaswami Mudaliar Vs. State of Madras and ors.
Chennai
Nov-28-1958
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 7, Rule 11; Madras Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - SectionS 41 and 87(2); Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 17
AIR1959Mad155
ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This civil revision petition is by one Thiruvengadaswami Mudaliar the plaintiff in an unnumbered claim suit of 1955 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court. Tirumelveli, for revising and setting aside the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArokyathammal Vs. Mookayee Alias Arokyathammal
Chennai
Sep-10-1958
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 27; Hindu Law
AIR1959Mad180
1. This is a second appeal preferred against the decree and judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge of Pudukottai in A. S. No. 20 of 1955 modifying the decree and judgment of the learned District Munsif...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPublic Prosecutor Vs. Saroja and anr.
Chennai
Dec-24-1958
Criminal
Madras Criminal Rules of Practice - Rule 185; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439
AIR1959Mad190; 1959CriLJ613; (1959)1MLJ193
1. These two matters have come up for orders before me today at the instance of the office. The facts were briefly these :2. Two women called Saroja, aged 24, and Alagu, aged 22, were convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »