Advanced Search Results
Chandappa Vs. SadruddIn Ansari
Karnataka
Dec-12-1957
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 14; Hyderabad Court-fees Act, 1324F - Sections 39; Indian Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115
AIR1958Kant132; AIR1958Mys132; ILR1957KAR448; (1958)36MysLJ139
ORDER1. These two revision petitions are directed against the notification issued by the former Gov Government of Hyderabad under Section 39 of the Hyderabad Court-fees Act. The notification is No. 1 dated 20-1-1954 and published in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeenappa Setty Vs. M.S. Suryanarayana Rao
Karnataka
Nov-21-1957
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 95
AIR1958Kant136; AIR1958Mys136; ILR1957KAR339; (1958)36MysLJ172
ORDER1. This petition arises out of an order made by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge of Mysore, awarding compensation of Rs. 100/-under Section 93 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Petitioner before me instituted a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamiah Vs. Cowdiah and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-26-1957
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 55, 57, 58, 58(2), 59, 60, 72(3), 89, 90 and 91
AIR1958Kant140; AIR1958Mys140; ILR1957KAR351; (1958)36MysLJ158
ORDER1. In execution of a money decree obtained against respondent 2, by respondent 1 an immoveable property was attached and ordered to be sold on 22-3-1956 and five days before that date the petitioner presented a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
H. Syed Ahmad Vs. Naghath Parveen Taj Begum
Karnataka
Jan-09-1958
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488, 488(1), 488(2) and 488(3)
AIR1958Kant128; AIR1958Mys128; 1958CriLJ1201; (1958)36MysLJ184
ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the learned City Magistrate, Bangalore, in Criminal Misc. No. 16 of 1956. It is an order passed under Section 488, Cr. P. C. The petitioner is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.K. Thayumanuvar Vs. Asanambal Ammal
Karnataka
Jun-24-1958
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488, 488(1), 488(2), 488(3), 488(4), 488(6) 488(8) and 489
AIR1958Kant190; AIR1958Mys190; 1958CriLJ1522; (1958)36MysLJ497
ORDER1. The petitioner has come up in revision against the order of the learned City Magistrate, Bangalore, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 393 of 1957, wherein he enhanced the maintenance to be paid by the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.C.N. Gowda and Bros. Vs. Molakram Tekchand and Sons
Karnataka
Aug-02-1957
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101 - Order 6, Rule 2; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 11, 13, 42 and 62; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 39, 65, 73 and 74; Common Law
AIR1958Kant10; AIR1958Mys10; ILR1957KAR72; (1957)35MysLJ221
Das Gupta, C.J. 1. The plaintiffs in the suit are the appellants before us. The appeal arises out of a suit instituted by the plaintiffs for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 3900/- being the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.K. Narayana Iyengar Vs. H.V. Subba Rao and anr.
Karnataka
Jan-09-1958
Tenancy
Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Act, 1951 - Sections 2(9), 8, 8(2), 8(3) and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 111, 112, 113 and 116
AIR1958Kant113; AIR1958Mys113; (1958)36MysLJ134
ORDER1. The petitioner before this Court is the tenant and the respondents are the landlords. The respondents applied to the learned Munsiff, Dodballapur, in H.R.C. No. 3 of 1954 to evict the petitioner on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuninajappa and ors. Vs. State of Mysore
Karnataka
Jan-13-1958
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 161 and 162; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145
AIR1958Kant138; AIR1958Mys138; 1958CriLJ1205; (1958)36MysLJ175
ORDER1. The petitioners are the accused in. C. C. No. 2038 of 1957 on the file or the First Class Magistrate, Bangalore. They are accused of an offence under Section 302, I. P, C. The case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.P. Appanna Vs. State of Coorg and anr.
Karnataka
Nov-28-1957
Direct TaxationConstitution
Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 29, 32, 45A, 47, 47(5), 76, 77, 77(1), 77(2), 78(2), 80(1), 80A and 129A; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 92(1), 92(2) and 97; Bihar Regulation, 1941 - Sections 3; Indian Finance Act, 1946 - Sections 11(9); Indian Finance Act, 1939 - Sections 6(1); Indian Finance Act, 1940; Indian Finance Act, 1938; Coorg Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1951 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 17, 18, 22(1), 22(2) and 62 ; Coorg Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 1(3) and 2; Coorg Devolution Rules - Rule 2 and 2(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 242, 245 and 246; India Provisional Constitution Order, 1947; Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 4, 22(1) and 22(2)
AIR1958Kant102; AIR1958Mys102; (1958)36MysLJ73
A.K. Somnath Iyer, J. 1. The principal question Involved in these twowrit petitions is the constitutional validity of an Act passed by the Legislative Council of the Chief Commissioner of Coorg, intituled the Coorg Agricultural Income-tax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Abdul Rahim Sahib Vs. G.S. Muthiah and Brothers and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-09-1957
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 10, 10(1) and 10(2)
AIR1958Kant134; AIR1958Mys134; (1958)36MysLJ31
Nittoor Sreenivasa Rau, J. 1. The Appellant applied for the registration of his trade mark in respect of beedies falling under Clause 34 of Schedule 4 to the Trade Marks Rules. The Respondent opposed the registration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »