Advanced Search Results
Dhumun Vs. Ram Dayal
Himachal Pradesh
Dec-11-1951
LimitationCivil
Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 3; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 104(2) and 115 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 43, Rule 1
AIR1952HP63
Chowdhry, J.C.1. This is a defendant's application in revision against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Chamba dated 4-4-1950 under Order 9, Rule 13, C. P. Code, rejecting his application to set aside the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirpa and anr. Vs. the State
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-14-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 164, 173 and 537; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 114; ;Punjab High Court Rules - Rule 13(1); ;Punjab High Court Orders
AIR1952HP68
Chowdhry, J.C. 1. Haria and Kirpa were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Mahasu and Sirmur for having committed criminal trespass into the house of an old man aged 77, named Panu, in village...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Kaidia
Himachal Pradesh
Aug-20-1951
LimitationCriminal
Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 12 and 12(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 417
AIR1952HP6
Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is an appeal on behalf of the Government under Section 417, Cr. P. C., against the acquittal of Kaidia respondent of an offence punishable under Section 302, I.P.C.2. The respondent was charged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lohku and anr. Vs. Bhola Ram
Himachal Pradesh
Mar-25-1952
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115 - Order 41, Rules 1 and 3
AIR1952HP62
Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is an application in revision by Lohku defendant for self and as guardian-adlitem of Roshan, defendant. There was a third defendant, Sundar, who is not a party to this revision.2. Bhola Ram...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSm. Kalawati Vs. the State
Himachal Pradesh
Jun-17-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 426(2B); ;Constitution of India - Articles 132, 132(1), 134, 134(1) and 136
AIR1952HP67
ORDERChowdhry, J.C. 1. As a result of a Government appeal under Section 417, Cr. P. G., Srimati Kalawati has been convicted by this Court under Section 302, read with Section 114, I. P. C., and sentenced...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandu and ors. Vs. Kirpa Ram and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-10-1951
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 75 - Order 26, Rule 11; ;Hindu Law
AIR1952HP65
Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is a defendants' first appeal arising out of a suit for partition between members of a Hindu trading family. As this is an appeal which was pending before the Chief Judicial Officer,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunshi Ram and anr. Vs. Raghubir Chand
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-30-1951
Civil
Merged States (Laws) Act, 1949 - Section 5; ;Punjab Court Fees (Amendment) Act; ;Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 1; ;Himachal Pradesh (Application of Laws) Order, 1948
AIR1952HP60
Chowdhry, J.C.(1) This is a defendants' appeal in which court-tee is payable on Rs. 4,496/5/-. According to the Taxing Officer the fee is payable under the Court-Fees Act (VII (7) of 1870), as amended by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Shanti Dutt and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Dec-10-1951
ExciseCriminal
Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Section 24
AIR1952HP61
Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is a Government appeal against the acquittal of Shanti Dutt, Amin Chand and Tokha by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Chamba on their appeal against conviction by a learned first class...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›