Advanced Search Results
State Vs. Basdeo
Allahabad
Oct-04-1950
Criminal
Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 2 and 2(3); Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rule 81(4); Uttar Pradesh Kerosene Control Order, 1942 - Rule 8
AIR1951All44
Desai, J.1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate of Shahjahanpur for enhancement of the sentence passed on Basudeo under Rule 81 (4), Defence of India Bales, read with Rule 9, U. P. Kerosene Control...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Charan Halwasiya and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Sep-18-1950
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 413
AIR1951All442
ORDERChandiramani, J.1. This is an application in revision against the order of Shri T. Prasad, Additional Sessions Judge, Lucknow, dated 22-5-1950.2. It appears that the three applicants, H. C. Halwasiya, D. P. Halwasiya and B. P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammad Wasi and anr. Vs. State
Allahabad
Sep-06-1950
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 561A
AIR1951All441
Agarwala, J.1.Mohammad Wasi and Shubrati were tried for offences under Sections 451 and 380 read with Section 75, I. P. C.2. The prosecution case was that on 10-11-1948 at about 8-30 A. M. these parsons bad...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raj Kuer Vs. Rajendra Bahadur Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-07-1950
PropertyCivil
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53, 53(1) and 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 8, Rule 9
AIR1951All443
Kidwai, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by Raj Kuer, appellant, on 26-2-1944, for recovery of possession of a house situate in village Bargawan, in the district of Sitapur, against the heirs of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›