Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mangaldas Motilal and Co.
Mumbai
Sep-29-1943
Direct Taxation
AIR1944Bom153; (1944)46BOMLR138
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference made by the Commissioner of Income- tax under Section 66(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, this Court having directed him to raise the question :Whether the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbraham Ezra Issac Mansoor Vs. Abdul Latif Usman
Mumbai
Nov-09-1943
PropertyCivil
AIR1944Bom156; (1944)46BOMLR159
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. By reason of the transactions mentioned by Mr. Justice Chagla in his judgment dated July 15, 1943, the defendant, who is the appellant in this Court, is the mortgagee of certain property...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Ayubkhan Mirsultan
Mumbai
Nov-26-1943
Criminal
AIR1944Bom159; (1944)46BOMLR203
Blagden, J.1. Joseph's submission here is that if a girl, being over fourteen and under sixteen and in lawful custody, consents to an act of illicit intercourse with a man and is persuaded to elope with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Bishwambharlal Maheshwari
Mumbai
Sep-27-1943
Direct Taxation
AIR1944Bom150; (1944)46BOMLR123
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference made by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, raising three questions. The first question is :Whether the Commissioner's refusal to interfere...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaul Engel Vs. Edith Engel
Mumbai
Jun-18-1943
Family
AIR1944Bom15; (1943)45BOMLR921
Blagden, J.1. The parties in this suit are respectively husband and wife, and the claim is by the husband for dissolution of marriage on the ground of the wife's adultery with a man whose identity is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›