Advanced Search Results
Harendra Kumar Roy Vs. ImamuddIn Saha and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-18-1942
Civil
AIR1943Cal56
Biswas, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of defendant 1 and is directed against the decision of the Subordinate Judge of Dinajpur, reversing that of the Munsif of Balurghat, by which he gave the plaintiffs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Nath Misra and ors. Vs. Trilochandas Dutta and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-06-1942
Property
AIR1943Cal565
Khundkar, J.1. The original zamindars of a certain tauzi, who were known as the Singh Deos, on 5th September 1879 executed a usufructuary mortgage of certain lands of the tauzi in favour of Chintamoni Dutt and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBogra Bank Ltd. Vs. Ramani Mohan Choudhury
Kolkata
Aug-14-1942
Civil
AIR1943Cal569
ORDERHenderson, J.1. This rule is not opposed. The petitioner is the decree-holder. He does not dispute the right of the opposite party to have the decree reopened on his application under Section 36(6), Bengal Money-Lenders Act....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Amir Hushen Vs. Abdul Bari Khan and ors.
Kolkata
May-31-1943
Civil
AIR1943Cal560
Mukherjea, J.1. This appeal is on behalf of defendant 1, and it arises out of a suit commenced by the plaintiff for recovery of possession of the lands in suit on establishment of his jote right...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDwijendra Nath Talukdar and anr. Vs. Makhon Lal Pramanik
Kolkata
Jun-08-1943
Criminal
AIR1943Cal564
ORDERHenderson, J.1. This rule raises substantial points of law and I directed that notice should be Served upon the Crown for them to appear. Mr. Sen has duly appeared and has shown t cause against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›