Advanced Search Results
Naresh Chandra Dutta Vs. Girish Chandra Das and anr.
Kolkata
Feb-22-1935
CivilProperty
AIR1936Cal17,160Ind.Cas.730
Mukerji, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for pre-emption. It is not disputed that the Mahomedan law of pre-emption applies to the case though the parties themselves are Hindus. The following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahatabuddIn Mia Vs. Mahammad Nazir Joddar
Kolkata
Aug-16-1935
Civil
AIR1936Cal170,166Ind.Cas.152
R.C. Mitter, J.1. The plaintiff's case is that on 14th Chaitra 1334, corresponding to 28th March 1928, the defendant borrowed from him a sum of Rs. 629 and executed in his favour a promissory note for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Charan Das and anr. Vs. Chairman of Labonga Samabai Samity
Kolkata
Aug-26-1935
Civil
AIR1936Cal171,162Ind.Cas.135
Lodge, J.1. This appeal arises out of orders passed on an objection under Section 47, Civil P. C. The material facts are these: Defendant 1 took a loan from the Labanga Samaboy Samity on mortgage of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Debendra Lal Khan and ors. Vs. Sudharam Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-28-1935
Property
AIR1936Cal173
M.N. Mukerji, J.1. The plaintiffs are the appellants in this appeal. The principal defendants were in occupation of some lands which belonged to the plaintiffs and their co-sharers, the pro forma defendants. These lands were recorded...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chandra Guha Vs. Dinanath Mestari and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-06-1935
Property
AIR1936Cal178
Henderson, J.1. This is an appeal against the decree of the lower appellate Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit for khas possession. It was originally argued before R.C. Mitter, J., and it has now come before us...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirad Chandra Sinha Sarma and ors. Vs. Sankar Chandra Shaha
Kolkata
Dec-10-1934
Tenancy
AIR1936Cal176
R.C. Mitter, J.1. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Mymensingh by which their suit for ejectment has been dismissed. It appears that three plots of land constituted a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›