Advanced Search Results
Sabhapati Dubey Vs. Ram Kissen Kumar
Kolkata
Jan-29-1935
Criminal
AIR1936Cal185
Nasim Ali, J.1. This Rule was issued against the Deputy Commissioner of Sibsagar and the complainant opposite party in a certain criminal case to show cause why the order of the Additional Sessions Judge of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalipada Bhandari Vs. Panchkari Mandal
Kolkata
Feb-04-1936
Tenancy
AIR1936Cal197
R.C. Mitter, J.1. This rule is directed against an order of the learned District Judge of Birbhum dated 7th March 1935 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 141 of 1934. The appeal was directed against an order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaresh Chandra Dutta Vs. Girish Chandra Das and anr.
Kolkata
Feb-22-1935
CivilProperty
AIR1936Cal17,160Ind.Cas.730
Mukerji, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for pre-emption. It is not disputed that the Mahomedan law of pre-emption applies to the case though the parties themselves are Hindus. The following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chandra Nath Das and ors. Vs. Puskar Chandra Das and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-23-1935
Civil
AIR1936Cal165
Nasim Ali, J.1. This is an appeal by some of the defendants in a suit for a declaration of fishery right of the fishermen of the village Manikpur in particular places (khaos) on the south bank...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNibaran Chandra Bhattacharjee Vs. Hem Nalini Debi and anr.
Kolkata
Mar-14-1935
Civil
AIR1936Cal167
ORDERHenderson, J.1. This is a rule calling upon the opposite parties to show cause why an order of the Munsiff dismissing an application made by the petitioner for pre-emption under the provisions of Section 26-F, Ben....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahatabuddIn Mia Vs. Mahammad Nazir Joddar
Kolkata
Aug-16-1935
Civil
AIR1936Cal170,166Ind.Cas.152
R.C. Mitter, J.1. The plaintiff's case is that on 14th Chaitra 1334, corresponding to 28th March 1928, the defendant borrowed from him a sum of Rs. 629 and executed in his favour a promissory note for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebendra Lal Khan and ors. Vs. Sudharam Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-28-1935
Property
AIR1936Cal173
M.N. Mukerji, J.1. The plaintiffs are the appellants in this appeal. The principal defendants were in occupation of some lands which belonged to the plaintiffs and their co-sharers, the pro forma defendants. These lands were recorded...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chandra Guha Vs. Dinanath Mestari and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-06-1935
Property
AIR1936Cal178
Henderson, J.1. This is an appeal against the decree of the lower appellate Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit for khas possession. It was originally argued before R.C. Mitter, J., and it has now come before us...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Chandra Chakravarty Vs. Abdul Haque Sardar and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-28-1935
Tenancy
AIR1936Cal180,162Ind.Cas.154
Nasim Ali, J.1. The suit out of which this appeal arises was for recovery of arrears of rent and for enhancement of rent under Section 30 (b), Ben. Ten. Act. In the present appeal, however, I...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. L.E. Renny and or ...
Kolkata
Jan-31-1935
Civil
AIR1936Cal184,162Ind.Cas.129
Lort-Williams, J.1. This is an appeal by the Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Bengal, on behalf of the Government of Assam, against a decision of the Extra Assistant Commissioner of Dibrugarh, acquitting the respondents of an offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »