Advanced Search Results
Mandapaka Sudarsana Rao Vs. Varada Kameswara Rao Naidu and anr.
Chennai
Mar-06-1935
CivilFamily
AIR1935Mad795; 159Ind.Cas.661; (1935)69MLJ177
Horace Owen Compton Beasley, Kt., C.J.1. The question arising in this appeal is whether, when a person has been validly appointed guardian-ad-litem of a minor defendant and subsequent to the date of the appointment of that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaji Jamal Noor Mahomed Sait Vs. A. Anandaraya Mudaliar and Company
Chennai
Apr-11-1935
Civil
AIR1935Mad791; 158Ind.Cas.546; (1935)69MLJ483
1. This is an appeal from an order of the learned Judge sitting on the Original Side made in chambers excusing the delay in lodging the bill of costs in Court and getting the costs taxed....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnappayya Mudali Vs. Emperor
Chennai
Sep-21-1934
Criminal
AIR1935Mad79
ORDER1. The petitioner is the renter of an arrack shop at Tirumani. It is supplied with arrack from the depot at Vellore, and on the occasion which gave rise to this case, a permit was issued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sankaranaraina Vazhunnavar Vs. Payatakan Valia Veettil Kunhi Raman Nai ...
Chennai
Mar-15-1935
Property
AIR1935Mad794; 158Ind.Cas.607
Varadachariar, J.1. The plaintiff sued to recover rent in respect of certain lands for the Malayalam year 1100 and 1101, claiming that he had become entitled to the amount as assignee of the same from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Sree Meenakshi Mills, Limited Vs. Calliangee and Sons and ors.
Chennai
Nov-15-1934
Land Acquisition
AIR1935Mad799; 156Ind.Cas.570
1. This case raises two points one of which is of some interest. The facts are not in dispute. It is unfortunate that the respondent who is the respondent to the appeal that raises the only...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›