Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Pubs: air1934mad735 · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.006 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Sep 05 1934

Saraswati Ammal Vs. Srinivasa Nandian and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-05-1934

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1934Mad735a; 153Ind.Cas.694

Madhavan Nair, J.1. The plaintiffs legal representative is the appellant. The first question that arises for determination in this second appeal is whether Ex. 6 is admissible in evidence. The plaintiff instituted the suit for recovery...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 16 1934

Tadepalli Subbiah Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934Mad735; 153Ind.Cas.627

ORDERWalsh, J.1. I think the order cannot be upheld. It has not been shown that the accused petitioner had any such definite knowledge of the petition given by the complainant to the District Magistrate, its date...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales