Advanced Search Results
Ram Prasad Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Sep-26-1932
Criminal
AIR1933All95; 140Ind.Cas.497
Pullan, J.1. The applicant Ram Prasad has been convicted of an offence under Section 17(1), Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, and ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 100, As a matter of fact, he underwent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuraj Deo Tewari Vs. Suraj NaraIn Man Tewari and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-08-1933
Civil
AIR1933All953; 147Ind.Cas.482
Rachhapal Singh, J.1. This is a defendant's second appeal. The facts which have given rise to this appeal are quite simple and are as follows:Suraj Deo Tewari instituted a suit against Sureman Man Tewari and attached...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMt. Govindi Vs. Ganga Prasad and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-31-1933
Civil
AIR1933All955; 147Ind.Cas.1256
Young, J.1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the District Judge Aligarh. The plaintiff brought a (sic) or a declaration that a certain compromise in connection with a house was not binding upon...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Har Prasad Agarwala Vs. Shankar Lal and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-11-1933
Civil
AIR1933All957; 147Ind.Cas.279
Kendall, J.1. This is an application for the revision of an order of the Munsif of Mirzapur rejecting the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint. The circumstances are as follows : The suit was brought...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDwarka Prasad and ors. Vs. Mt. Jasoda Kunwar and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-16-1932
Civil
AIR1933All958; 147Ind.Cas.999
Mukerji, Ag. C.J.1. This appeal is very easily disposed of on the ground that it is barred under Section 42, Specific Relief Act. At p. 3 of the printed record there is a pedigree. The claim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaij Nath Prasad Vs. Khedu Ram and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-01-1932
Civil
AIR1933All959; 147Ind.Cas.1002
ORDERMukerji, Ag. C.J.1. A preliminary objection is taken that neither the revisions nor the: second appeals are competent.2. The facts on which the preliminary objections are based are simple and short. It appears that Khedu Ram...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanpat Kewat Vs. Raja Ram Gopal Singh
Allahabad
Aug-09-1933
Tenancy
AIR1933All954
Collister, J.1. This was a suit under Section 48 of the Agra Tenancy Act (Act 3 of 1926). The plaintiff appellant is an occupancy tenant and the defendant respondent is his zamindar. From 1325-F up to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask(Firm) Damodar Sarup Balsarup Vs. (Firm) Daya Shanker and Neader Mal
Allahabad
Sep-18-1933
Civil
AIR1933All956; 147Ind.Cas.59
ORDERKendall, J.1. This is a plaintiff's application for the revision of an order of the Judge of the Small Cause Court: of Meerut decreeing the plaintiff's suit in part. The circumstances are that the plaintiff sued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kumar and anr. Vs. Ram Chandar Sharma
Allahabad
Jan-17-1933
Property
AIR1933All959a
ORDER1. This is a revision against (sic) order dated 30th April 1932 by which the learned Subordinate Judge refused to decide the value of the properties sought to be sold and directed that the house property...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›