Advanced Search Results
Roy Kiran Chandra Roy and anr. Vs. Rama Nath Dutta Chowdhury and anr.
Kolkata
Mar-18-1930
Civil
AIR1931Cal104
Rankin, C.J.1. In this case, the plaintiff is a tenure-holder under a revenue paying estate bearing No. 3841. He is not a tenure-holder of the whole of the land of the estate but he is a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal Jana and ors. Vs. Broja Mohan Swami and ors.
Kolkata
May-13-1930
Family
AIR1931Cal105
Mitter, J.1. After hearing Mr. Jogesh Chandra Roy, the learned advocate for the appellants, we did not think it necessary to call upon the respondents for a reply, for we think that the findings of fact...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Charitar Dubey Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jan-28-1930
Civil
AIR1931Cal10
Patterson, J.1. In our opinion this case must go back for retrial and for the following reasons:It being admitted that the appellant had received Rs. 479-4-0 on behalf of the complainant, the main question for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Durga Charan Debnath and ors. Vs. Ganga Dhar Debnath and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-26-1930
Civil
AIR1931Cal109
Mitter, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs and arises in a suit for partition. There were numerous defendants to the suit; defendants 12 and 14 however, did not enter appearance in the suit; the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagendra Nath Bose Vs. Mon Mohan Singha Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-13-1930
Tenancy
AIR1931Cal100,129Ind.Cas.849
Graham, J.1. This rule was issued to show cause why an order of the District Judge of Hooghly dismissing an appeal arising out of certain rent execution proceedings should not be set aside, or such other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMt. Kiransasi Ghose Vs. Panchanan Ghose
Kolkata
Jan-17-1930
Family
AIR1931Cal102
1. This appeal has arisen out of an order passed by the District Judge of 24 Parganas removing the appellant from her position of guardianship of her minor son Dhirender Krishna Ghose. It appears that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMoti Lal Dutt Vs. Kali Das Bhattacharji and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-19-1929
Civil
AIR1931Cal107
1. This rule is directed against an order of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Khulna passed under Order 23, Rule 1, Civil P.C. The order is in these terms:Heard Pleaders; the appellants are permitted to withdraw...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›