Advanced Search Results
Gambhir Singh and anr. Vs. Surendra Singh and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-07-1930
Tenancy
AIR1930All455; 129Ind.Cas.373
Dalal, J.1. The District Judge has wrongly refused jurisdiction. His attention does not appear to have been drawn to the provisions of Section 248(3), Agra Tenancy Act. What happened in the present case was this. A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurtaza Khan and ors. Vs. Ajit Prasad
Allahabad
Nov-25-1929
Property
AIR1930All458
Bennet, J.1. This is a second appeal in which a Bench of this Court remanded an issue for finding by the lower appellate Court as to whether a certain plot in dispute was 'land' as defined...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLatafat Ali Khan and anr. Vs. Mohammad Yar Khan and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-12-1929
Property
AIR1930All456
1. A preliminary objection is taken to the hearing of this appeal and for the purposes of this objection only a few facts need be mentioned.2. The plaintiffs instituted a suit for pre-emption of a zamindari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mt. Bakhtawari Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Sep-09-1929
Criminal
AIR1930All45
1. Mt. Bakhtawari was committed to the Court of Sessions at Meerut to take her trial under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C.2. The charge was that on 27th November 1928, she murdered one Harbans, chaukidar by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamnath Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jun-11-1929
Criminal
AIR1930All450
Boys, J.1. Ramnath, the appellant, was put on his trial on a charge under Section 302, I.P. C, of having murdered his wife on 26th August 1928. We have read the judgment of the learned Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopi Singh Vs. Kesho Saran and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-19-1929
Property
AIR1930All459; 122Ind.Cas.768
Dalal, J.1. It is difficult to understand the facts of the case on the basis of the evidence on the record. There were two brothers Kesho Saran and Ram Baran. It is not necessary to note...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaya Ram Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Dec-05-1929
Civil
AIR1930All452
Dalal, J.1. Dr. Katju who argued this application for revision desired to impress the Court by stating that members of both sections of the Radhaswami sect were mostly LL. Bs. and not likely to cause a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›