Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Tika Ram
Allahabad
Jun-08-1928
Civil
AIR1928All680
Boys, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of the Local Government. A citation, Ex. A in the case, under 8. 147, U.P. Land Revenue Act of 1901, was served upon Tika Ram the opposite party...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTika Ram Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
May-18-1928
Property
AIR1928All687; 110Ind.Cas.675
Dalal, J.1. This is a revision, so the findings of fact of the Subordinate Courts must be accepted. The applicant Tika Ram has been convicted under Section 36, Works of Defence Act (7 of 1903). It...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Sarup Kalwar and anr. Vs. Mahabir Kalwar
Allahabad
Jul-10-1928
Civil
AIR1928All685
Sen, J.1. This is an appeal by two defendants, Ram Sarup Kolwar and Sukhdeo Kalwar in a suit for a declaration that the decree obtained by Sukhdeo against the plaintiff Mahabir in suit No. 338 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ram Sarup Vs. Hardeo Prasad
Allahabad
Jul-05-1927
Banking
AIR1928All68; 108Ind.Cas.144
Lindsay, J.1. This application for revision under Section 25, Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, has been referred for decision to a Bench and the question to be determined is the liability of the defendant-appellant Ram Sarup...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManni Lal Awasthi Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Aug-17-1928
Criminal
AIR1928All682
Dalal, J.1. There have been many hearings in this case and I have spent many anxious hours to discover whether the judgment of the Joint Magistrate, so severely shaken by the learned Judge, arrived in this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDallo Vs. Jagan Lal
Allahabad
Jul-13-1928
Civil
AIR1928All688; 110Ind.Cas.818
Dalal, J.1. It is correctly stated in the ground of objection that what the lower Court has put in as a judgment is no judgment in fact. The Court itself appears to have felt some shyness...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBidha and ors. Vs. Bhola and ors.
Allahabad
May-15-1928
Property
AIR1928All681
Dalal, J.1. The plaintiffs, lessees under a prior transfer, sued for the ejectment of the defendants who are lessees under a subsequent transfer. The zamindar was also made defendant. The zamindar executed a lease on 11th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinayat HusaIn Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
May-04-1928
Criminal
AIR1928All684
King, J.1. These are we applications for the revision of certain orders passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patehpur, on 3rd December 1927. The facts are that a zamindar, Khan Bahadur Inayat Husain, is said to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangacharya and ors. Vs. Guru Revti Raman Acharya
Allahabad
Jun-06-1928
Trusts and Societies
AIR1928All689; 114Ind.Cas.734
1. This is a special appeal in Suit No. 111 of 1923 instituted by Guru Reoti Raman Acharya against Jaistha Madhav Acharya and seven others, and relates to the temple of Thakur Gat Shram Narainji Maharaj,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›