Advanced Search Results
Mulai Rai Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Dec-07-1925
Criminal
AIR1926All277; 92Ind.Cas.863
Sulaiman, J.1. This is a criminal revision from an order convicting the accused tinder Section 190 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 55.2. The applicant is the mukhtar-am of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamlapati Panth Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jun-02-1925
Criminal
AIR1926All27
Boys, J.1. In this case on the 10th of December 1924, a panchayat held under the U.P. Act (6 of 1920) convicted Kamlapati. Panth, Parkhotam Panth and Sheo Datt Panth under Section 323 of the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuhammad Ismail Vs. Vahiduddin
Allahabad
Dec-03-1925
Civil
AIR1926All270
Mukerji, J.1. This revision arises out of a suit for recovery of money brought on a promissory-note, dated the 10th of August 1923, admittedly executed by the respondent in favour of the plaintiff-applicant.2. The Court below...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
JalaluddIn Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-18-1925
Criminal
AIR1926All271
1. Jalaluddin, Excise Inspector of the Bijnor District, applied to the High Court in revision to have his conviction under Section 161, Indian Penal Code, for taking an illegal gratification from a liquor contractor, set aside....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtma Ram Vs. Nanak Chand and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-30-1925
Property
AIR1926All274
Mukerji, J.1. This is an appeal by an auction-purchaser in the following circumstances:2. One Mahbub Ali Shah was the original owner of a certain share in the property described as 61/3 sihams. He mortgaged four sihams...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu and anr. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-30-1925
Civil
AIR1926All276
Sulaiman, J.1. This is a Reference by the Sessions Judge of Muttra recommending that the conviction of the accused under Section 24 of the Cattle Trespass Act (1 of 1871) should be set aside. A report...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Kishen Prasad and anr. Vs. Kunj Behari Lal
Allahabad
Oct-28-1925
Civil
AIR1926All278
Mukerji, J.1. This is a decree-holder's appeal. On the 29th of May 1924 the suit out of which the present execution proceedings have arisen was compromised. The appellants here had claimed Rs. 15,000 odd and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›