Advanced Search Results
Nathu Mal Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jan-07-1925
Criminal
AIR1925All309
Mukerji, J.1. These are twelve applications in revision against the applicants' conviction under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act of 1867.2. The whole question to be determined in these petitions is whether the applicants were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTufail Ahmad and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Sep-25-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All301a
Mukerji, J.1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Meerut, recommending that the conviction of seven persons, Tufail Ahmad and others, may be set aside and the fine inflicted upon them may be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanhe Lal Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Oct-24-1924
Civil
AIR1925All301
Mukerji, J.1. This is an application by one Nanhe Lal to obtain a reversal of his conviction under Section 4 of the Public Gambling Act (Act No. III of 1867).2. It appears that an Assistant Superintendent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ameraj Singh Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Dec-02-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All306
Mukerji, J.1. This is an application in revision against the conviction of one Ameraj under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been ordered to undergo 18 months' rigorous imprisonment and to pay a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLalji and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-26-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All308
Daniels, J.1. The applicant, Newaz Rai, has been convicted under Sections 147 and 224 of the Indian Penal Code and the other applicants under Sections 147 and 225 of the Indian Penal Code. On the findings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGhuriya and ors. Vs. Baneswar and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-28-1924
Tenancy
AIR1925All30; 83Ind.Cas.202
Sulaiman, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit brought for ejectment against the defendants on the allegation that the defendants were his subtenants.2. Baneshwar, one of the defendants, pleaded that he was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChittar Singh Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Sep-19-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All303; 85Ind.Cas.650
Sulaiman, J.1. His Lordship after discussing facts and evidence, proceeded:The first piece of evidence which requires consideration is the so-called first information report. There are two fatal objections to its admissibility. In the first place, it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDulli and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Aug-06-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All305; 85Ind.Cas.714
Sulaiman, J.1. This is an appeal filed by four appellants. The first three have been convicted under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment each, and the fourth under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAzimuddIn Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Oct-20-1924
Excise
AIR1925All307
Mukerji, J.1. Without discussing the law on the point at length, it seems to be clear that in this case there should have been no conviction of Azimuddin under Section 64 of the Excise Act (Local...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›