Advanced Search Results
Lachhmi NaraIn Vs. Musammat Brij Rani
Allahabad
May-27-1924
Criminal
AIR1924All794; 80Ind.Cas.39
Sulaiman, J.1. This appeal has been filed as an Execution First Appeal from an order dated the 27th of January 1923.2. A compromise decree had been passed in favour of the respondent against the appellant under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagelu Vs. Dharma and ors.
Allahabad
May-14-1923
Civil
AIR1924All79; (1923)ILR45All623
Ryves and Daniels, JJ.1. The facts out of which this appeal arises are as follows: Bhagelu brought a suit against Musammat D harm a .for restitution of conjugal rights, and, as Musammat Dharma was a minor,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Sia and anr. Vs. Bua
Allahabad
Jul-03-1924
Land Acquisition
AIR1924All790; 84Ind.Cas.360
1. This appeal raises a question of Hindu Law, namely, whether claimants Ram Sia and Sheo Prasad are heirs as bandhus to the deceased Basi. The pedigree is given in the judgment of the learned Subordinate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mehi Lal Vs. Ramji Dass and anr.
Allahabad
Jul-04-1924
Education
AIR1924All792; 80Ind.Cas.939
1. This appeal raises, a nice point and a very interesting point, namely as to the meaning of the words 'seen it' used with reference to a document in Section 63 of the Evidence Act. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Baijnath Singh Vs. Chandrapal Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-24-1924
Land Acquisition
AIR1924All795; 83Ind.Cas.204
1. The question raised in this Letters Patent Appeal is whether the respondents had a right to transfer their grove. The suit was for the ejectment of the respondents on the ground that the respondents Nos....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›