Advanced Search Results
Narayan Balkrishna Kulkarni Vs. Gopal Jiv Ghadi
Mumbai
Jan-22-1914
Property
AIR1914Bom36(2); (1914)16BOMLR206
Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. The plaintiffs sued to have an account taken under the provisions of the Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act of all transactions from the commencement in connection with two mortgages of the 20th December...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjunath Subrayabhat Vs. Shankar Manjaya Apartha
Mumbai
Jul-08-1914
Civil
AIR1914Bom318; (1914)16BOMLR593
Beaman, J.1. The property in question in this suit is a vritti. The plaintiff claims to be the alienee of three-quarters of the cash-allowance paid for the due performance of ceremonies and the worshipping of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSitabai Raghunath Karmakar Vs. Shambhu Sonu Gajana
Mumbai
Jul-07-1914
PropertyCivil
AIR1914Bom312(1); (1914)16BOMLR595
Beaman, J.1. The only question argued before us is whether the defendants, who are found to be permanent tenants, have a right to cut trees upon the lands demised. The plaintiff is found to be the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Burjorji Ruttonji Bomanji Vs. Bhagvandas Parashram
Mumbai
Mar-28-1913
Contract
AIR1914Bom319; (1913)15BOMLR716; 20Ind.Cas.834
Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. This suit was brought by the plaintiffs, a firm of Marwari merchants, who act inter alia as pakka adatias to recover from the defendant Rs. 90,763-14-6 and interest as the amount due...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAndrew Yule and Co. Vs. Ardeshir Bomanji Dubash
Mumbai
Mar-27-1913
Contract
AIR1914Bom312(2); (1913)15BOMLR724; 20Ind.Cas.844
Beaman, J.1. Assuming the agreement of the 22nd November 1911, to charter the S 6 Gymeric to the plaintiffs for twelve consecutive voyages, to be in all respects good, there is still a question to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChimna Sadashiv Vs. Ram Dayal Prayagdas
Mumbai
Jul-22-1914
PropertyCivil
AIR1914Bom302(2); (1914)16BOMLR648
Basil Scott, Kt. C.J.1. The present plaintiff claims to be the holder of a mortgage for Rs. 3,000 and interest upon certain property which has passed to the 5th defendant, the respondent, on a sale in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAppaji Bharmappa Umrani Vs. Thalegauda Satyappa Umrani
Mumbai
Jul-20-1914
Property
AIR1914Bom311; (1914)16BOMLR661
Basil Scott, Kt. C.J.1. We are of opinion that this suit is barred by limitation. The Mamlatdar's order was passed in favour of the defendant for possession on the 28th of September 1906, and from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: the Arbitration Between the Bombay Gas Company Ltd. and
Mumbai
Mar-27-1914
Arbitration
AIR1914Bom303; (1914)16BOMLR964
Davar, J.1. In the special case submitted to us by the Arbitrators there are two questions for our consideration. In our opinion the first question referred must be answered in the affirmative. Large powers are conferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchandra Anandrao Kulkarni Vs. Pandu Dagdu Teli
Mumbai
Dec-02-1913
Civil
AIR1914Bom30; (1914)16BOMLR75
Shah, J.1. This is an appeal by defendant No. 2 against the decree passed by the Court of the Civil Judge at Vinchur in Suit No. 85 of 1912. A preliminary objection is raised by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mir Husen Abdul Rahiman
Mumbai
Dec-04-1913
Criminal
AIR1914Bom3; (1914)16BOMLR84
Shah, J.1. This is an application for the revision of an order by made under Section 514 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the Second Class Magistrate of Khalapur ordering the petitioner's recognizance bond to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »