Advanced Search Results
T.R. Paramasivam and anr. Vs. Parvathareddy Chenchuramireddy and ors.
Chennai
Feb-26-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad345; (1942)1MLJ316
King, J.1. The appellants here sued the defendants upon a promissory note executed jointly by the first defendant and another by name- Lakshminarasa Reddi Lakshpinarasa Reddi became insolvent in 1931 and included this debt in his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRao Sahib V. Subbayya and ors. Vs. C.T. Machayya and anr.
Chennai
May-01-1941
Company
AIR1942Mad365; (1942)1MLJ207
ORDER7. The only point argued by Mr. Bhujanga Rao was that the decree against his client is not in accordance with the judgment. This matter was dealt with by the District Judge in paragraph 40 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangaswami Pillai Alias Rama Pillai and ors. Vs. Vasu Ammal Alias Srin ...
Chennai
Oct-14-1941
Property
AIR1942Mad388; (1942)1MLJ289
Wadsworth, J. 1. This case raises a question relating to the admissibility of a plea of benami in a matter arising under Section 4 (h) of Act IV of 1938. The petitioners here were the judgment-debtors...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.P. Kesavalu Naidu Vs. A.R. Venkatarama Chettiar and anr.
Chennai
Feb-04-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad35; (1941)2MLJ450
Somayya, J.1. This is a civil revision petition filed against the decree of the Subordinate Judge of Kumbakonam passed in S.C.S. No. 218 of 1937. The plaintiff whose suit was dismissed in the lower Court is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKannepalli Chinna Venkata Chelamiah Sastri Vs. Meduru Annapoornamma an ...
Chennai
Jan-26-1942
Limitation
AIR1942Mad353; (1942)1MLJ469
ORDERAlfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. When the judgment of the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Udaypal Singh v. Lakhmi Chand I.L.R. (1935) All. 261 and the judgment of the Privy Council in Rama...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.R. Sankaralingam Pillai Vs. Veluchami Pillai, Minor by Adoptive Moth ...
Chennai
Nov-10-1941
FamilyProperty
AIR1942Mad338; (1942)1MLJ119
Venkataramana Rao, J.1. This second appeal raises a question of some difficulty and importance in the Hindu law of adoption. The facts are undisputed and may be briefly stated. One K. Ramaswami Pillai had four sons...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuppala Subbarayudu and anr. Vs. Ammanamanchi Venkatasubbamma
Chennai
Aug-27-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad375; (1942)1MLJ87
Venkataramana Rao, J.1. In Lakshmayya v. Official Receiver, Kistna : (1937)2MLJ11 for-the purpose of Section 60 (1) (c), Civil Procedure Code, an agriculturist is defined as follows:An 'agriculturist' within the meaning of Section 60 (1) (c)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVallabhaneni Venkayya Vs. Sri Rajah Vijaya Apparao Savai Aswarao Bahad ...
Chennai
Jan-31-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad352; (1942)1MLJ116
Krishnaswami Ayyangar, J.1. The findings returned by the learned Subordinate Judge on the issues sent down to him are accepted. The result is that the appellant's property is not a riparian tenement in respect of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sv.Rm.Ar. Ramanathan Chettiar
Chennai
Sep-08-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad390; (1942)1MLJ111
ORDERVenkataramana Rao, J.1. The question referred to me for decision is whether court-fee paid by the petitioner on the memorandum of the civil revision petition presented to this Court against the order made by the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThottilakath Puthiapurayil Alias Kurikkalavita Kunhabdulla Vs. Thottil ...
Chennai
Sep-09-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad320; (1942)1MLJ217
Lakshmana Rao, J.1. The view of the Collector that orders cannot be passed on a petition under Section 20 (1) of the Madras Act XVII of 1939 until the suit for partition under Chapter III of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »