Advanced Search Results
Vali Venkataswami Chettiar Vs. Minor Ramalingam and ors.
Chennai
Feb-01-1945
PropertyLimitation
AIR1945Mad157; (1945)1MLJ233
Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. The question referred is in the following terms:Is the claim for a supplemental decree in a suit for sale barred by time where the bond provides that the mortgage money shall...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUday Chand Mahatab Vs. Kuroram Mukherjee and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-12-1943
Tenancy
AIR1945Cal99
B.K. Mukherjea, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of the landlord decree-holder and is directed against an order made by the District Judge, Birbhum, affirming an order of the Subordinate Judge of that place allowing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mogila Doraiswami Naidu and anr.
Chennai
Jan-17-1945
Criminal
AIR1945Mad302; (1945)1MLJ178
ORDERHappell, J.1. The Sub-Magistrate, Puttur, in Criminal Case No. 432 of 1944, convicted two youths of offences under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case was that the first accused, who was travelling...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kompella Yegnanarayana Somayajulu and ors. Vs. Akella Subbarayudu
Chennai
Feb-27-1945
Civil
AIR1945Mad203; (1945)1MLJ339
Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. The question which is raised in this reference is whether the judgment of the Federal Court in Bank of Commerce, Ltd., Khulna v. Kunja Behari Kar (1945) 1 M.L.J. 24 :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamuel Fitz and Company Limited Vs. the Standard Cotton and Silk Weavi ...
Chennai
Mar-01-1945
Contract
AIR1945Mad291; (1945)2MLJ24
Horwill, J.1. The appellant is a Joint Stock Company havine its office at Calcutta. We know that it had dealings with a merchant in Australia to whom it sold cotton fabrics, described as tapestries, of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M.P.L. Chokkalingam Chettiar Vs. M.L.R.M. Lakshmanan Chettiar and an ...
Chennai
Aug-16-1944
civil limitation
AIR1945Mad1
King, J.1. The question involved in the determination of this appeal is the interpretation of Order 21, Rule 2, Civil P.C. The facts of the case are that respondent 1 obtained a decree in O.S. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.C. Chinniah Chettiar Vs. Sivagami Achi Alias Sornam Achi and ors.
Chennai
Sep-04-1944
family property
AIR1945Mad21
Leach, C.J.1. The question in this appeal is one of interpretation of Sub-section (2) of Section 3, Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937. The sub-section states that when a Hindu governed by a School of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsharam Thikadar Vs. Dan Chand Chapra and ors.
Kolkata
May-04-1943
Civil
AIR1945Cal61
B.K. Mukherjea, J.1 Having heard Mr. Bagchi for the appellant and Mr. Khaitan for the respondents, we are of opinion that the Court below approached the case from a wrong standpoint and failed to advert to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. S. Roy Vs. Karuna Kisore Kar
Kolkata
Dec-02-1943
Civil
AIR1945Cal452
ORDERSen, J.1. This is an application by the defendant for relief under the Bengal Money-Lenders Act. The plaintiff, Dr. S. Roy, instituted a suit against the defendant on a promissory note which had been executed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManindra Kumar De and anr. Vs. Satish Chandra De and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-16-1945
Civil
AIR1945Cal456
1. This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by two plaintiffs to set aside a sale held in execution of a certificate under the Public Demands Recovery Act. The plaintiffs alleged fraud, and fraudulent suppression...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »