Advanced Search Results
Sri Gobinda Chowdhuri Vs. Maharaja Rao Jogendra Narayan Ray and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-20-1934
Civil
AIR1934Cal812,153Ind.Cas.304
Nasim Ali, J.1. This is a Rule calling upon the opposite parties to show cause why the order of the District Judge of Pabna refusing the application of the petitioner for setting aside a patni sale...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Nath Samaddar and ors. Vs. Anandachandra Shaha and ors.
Kolkata
May-25-1933
Property
AIR1934Cal60,147Ind.Cas.1031
1. The plaintiffs in the suit, in which this appeal has arisen, sought to have their title as tenants under the defendants declared in regard to lands comprised in four plots, C.S. plots Nos. 111, 114,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Chandra Benode Das
Kolkata
Jan-26-1934
Criminal
AIR1934Cal808,152Ind.Cas.943
Mallik, J.1. This rule was issued on Babu Chandra Benode Das, a pleader of Sunamganj Munsif's Court in the District of Sylhet, to show cause why he should not be suspended or dismissed under the provisions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lotus Ltd. Vs. Mt. Nasiunnessaba Begum
Kolkata
Aug-28-1933
Civil
AIR1934Cal600
Panckridge, J.1. The plaintiffs in this case are a company registered at Stafford in England carrying on business as boot and shoe manufacturers. They state that they are the sole proprietors of a registered trade mark...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.C. Galstaun Vs. Janaki Nath Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Nov-23-1933
Civil
AIR1934Cal615,152Ind.Cas.215
1. This is an application for return of a memorandum of appeal (which was not registered on the ground that it was filed out of time) with a certificate authorising the petitioner to receive back from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJogesh Chandra Mukherjee Vs. Rai Beharilal Mitra Bahadur and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-15-1933
Property
AIR1934Cal799
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of possessions of the lands specified in Schedule (gha) and for confirmation of possession of the lands of Schedule (ga) of the plaint,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKashim Ali and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Feb-09-1934
Criminal
AIR1934Cal651,152Ind.Cas.234
1. The appellants were tried for the commission of offences Under Sub-section 395 and 120.B/395, I.P.C., and were, on the unanimous verdict of the jury, before whom the trial was held, convicted by the learned Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarey Harey Sinha Chowdhury Vs. Saradindu Narayan Ray and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-14-1934
Tenancy
AIR1934Cal642
Mallik, J.1. This appeal arises out of an application made by the landlord Under Section 105, Ben. Ten. Act, for settlement of a fair and equitable rent. The plaintiff's claim was resisted by the tenant defendant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHafijuddi and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Apr-27-1934
Criminal
AIR1934Cal678
1. The prisoners Hafijuddi (Hafijuddin) alias Bengu, Asgar Ali, Har Chandra De (Chowkidar) alias Hari Chandra De alias Hari Chowkidar, Kalai Prodhan, Syed Ali (Haji), Kadam Ali Sarkar Maharam Ali Talukdar alias Mohor Ali, Abdul, Jahar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: S.M. Khatumennessa Bibi
Kolkata
Feb-21-1934
Civil
AIR1934Cal659,153Ind.Cas.201
Mitter, J.1. This matter comes before us for consideration as to whether in the exercise of our discretion Under Section 149, Civil P.C., we should allow the appellant to put in the deficit court-fees. It appears...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »